Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.1MEducation$943kPhilanthropy$706kHousing & Shelter$636kReligion$603kPublic Benefit$463kEnvironment$385kHuman Services$220kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $645k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.2M
$62,525
Median grant
6
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,252,044
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$500,000
NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$435,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$171,050
FORT WORTH REPORT$131,688
NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$121,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$62,525
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO$58,750
RESTORATION CENTER$45,475
FRIENDS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY INC$37,000
HAYWARD INSTITUTE$28,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL$25,000
TEXANS ON MISSION$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF QUEBEC TEXOMA DIVISION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $50k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $50k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
RI
CA
CO
MD
DE
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 15 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$8.4M
$748k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+7%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +81%
  • RC
    Restoration Center
    8× · 2018–2025 · $649k · revenue +99% · 57% of their budget
  • FW
    FORT WORTH REPORT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $480k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of Texas Health Science Center at S
    one grant, 2023 · $310k
  • PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    Friends of Fort Worth Nature Center
    one grant, 2024 · $110k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
8
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
11
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $4,420,450 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIONORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,808,044 · OtherNORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONThe University of Texas Health Science Center at S: $309,645 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank: $290,000 · Other+19 more: $1,539,800 · Other+19 moreTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1,136,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBY…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $575,050 · EducationUNIVERSIT…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $400,000 · EducationMassachus…FRIENDS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY INC: $37,000 · Education+1 more: $29,999 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $696,200 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRestoration Center: $648,740 · ReligionFORT WORTH REPORT: $479,576 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $384,950 · Health
Other$8,367,939Housing & Shelter$1,136,000Education$1,042,049Philanthropy$706,200Religion$648,740Public Benefit$479,576Health$384,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1,136,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $696,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRestoration Center: $648,740 over 8y, 57% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $575,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH REPORT: $479,576 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $384,950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $290,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnBound North Texas: $70,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $29,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TREES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNBOUND NOW: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX ↗
  • Who funds Restoration Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH REPORT ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds UnBound North Texas ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TREES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply FundTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marilyn Brachman Hoffman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marilyn Brachman Hoffman’s filings →

More from the funding graph