Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mansfield Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$559kArts & Culture$362kHealth$250kPhilanthropy$119kYouth Development$95kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $193k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LANDFALL FOUNDATION INC$40,000
GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS$38,500
LANSING CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$36,000
MAYO CLINIC$30,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - WHARTON CENTER$16,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - SPARTAN FUND$12,000
ELE'S PLACE$10,000
CHARLEVOIX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
CROOKED TREE ARTS CENTER$5,600
GET TO FOUNDATION$2,500
NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY$1,000
CHALLENGE MOUNTAIN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$1.5M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+63%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    The Landfall Foundation Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +145%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • CM
    CHALLENGE MOUNTAIN OF WALLOON HILLS INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CE
    Chelsea Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • NM
    NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +73%
  • TH
    TOWN HALL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
3
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
6
Manchester Mental Health Foundation

To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

Health
7
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
8
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
9
Maine Community Foundation Inc

The Maine Community Foundation brings people and resources together to build a better Maine.

Philanthropy
10
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
11
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
12
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlevoix County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANSING CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $367,750 · OtherLANSING CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $242,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $228,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYCROOKED TREE ART CENTER: $75,000 · OtherCROOKED TREE ART CENTER+11 more: $85,350 · Other+11 moreGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $304,050 · Arts & CultureGreat Lakes Center fo…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Landfall Foundation Inc: $130,000 · PhilanthropyThe Landfal…Charlevoix County Community Foundation: $39,000 · PhilanthropyCharlevoix …ELE'S PLACE INC: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAYO CLINIC: $30,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,500 · HealthCAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$998,100Arts & Culture$314,050Philanthropy$169,000Youth Development$105,000Health$37,500Housing & Shelter$15,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $304,050 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetThe Landfall Foundation Inc: $130,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $105,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCharlevoix County Community Foundation: $39,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetChelsea Education Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetNORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE MOUNTAIN OF WALLOON HILLS INC: $4,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Great Lakes Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds The Landfall Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Charlevoix County Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Chelsea Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds TOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE MOUNTAIN OF WALLOON HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mansfield Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mansfield Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mansfield Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph