Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Manny and Cecile Hernandez Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$39kInternational$30kMembership Benefit$28kAnimals$27kHuman Services$25kPhilanthropy$22kEducation$18kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTER$7,500
MAUI UNITED WAY$5,000
ANGELS OF HOPE$4,000
ABC'S FOR GLOBAL HEALTH$4,000
SOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB$3,000
HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION$3,000
ALAMEDA COUNTRY COMM FOOD BANK$3,000
MONTCLAIRE PARENT TEACHER ORG$2,500
VIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE$2,000
WORLD VISION PHIL EARTHQUAKE RELIEF FX FEE$1,387
HOLY SPIRIT$1,385
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RES HOSPITAL$1,000
SOS MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
ST VICTOR CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ABC'S FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $4k → 7%VIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE: $2k → 8%ANGELS OF HOPE: $4k → 11%MAUI UNITED WAY: $10k → 9%SPECIAL OLYMPICS NM: $2k → 14%PAULINIAN GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%DAV CHARTABLE SVC: $2k → 10%ABC'S FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $3k → 7%VIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE: $2k → 8%ANGELS OF HOPE: $3k → 11%MAUI UNITED WAY: $7k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%UPSILON GAMMA PHI BETA PSI: $5k → 6%ABC'S FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $3k → 7%VIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE: $2k → 8%ANGELS OF HOPE: $3k → 11%MAUI UNITED WAY: $5k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%UPSILON GAMMA PHI BETA PSI: $4k → 6%ABC GLOBAL HEALTH: $3k → 7%ABODE SERVICES: $3k → 10%ANGELS OF HOPE: $3k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA: $3k → 6%ABC GLOBAL HEALTH: $3k → 7%ABODE SERVICES: $3k → 10%PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTER: $8k → 6%ABC'S FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $2k → 7%HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%ABODE SERVICES: $2k → 10%PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTER: $6k → 6%HAPPY HOLLOW: $3k → 8%PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTER: $5k → 6%HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SV: $2k → 10%HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%HAPPY HOLLOW: $3k → 8%HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%ST RAYMOND'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $2k → 10%HAPPY HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%MONTCLAIRE PARENT TEACHER ORG: $3k → 8%SOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB: $3k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 8%SOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB: $2k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW CHILDRENS CORNER: $5k → 8%ALAMEDA COUNTRY COMM FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NV
IA
CA
KY
VA
NM
TN
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 29 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
29

Total granted

$205k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+43%

Still filing today

48%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MAUI UNITED WAY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $22k · revenue +188%
  • HH
    Happy Hollow Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +121%
  • AF
    ABCs for Global Health Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • LA
    Los Altos Mountain View Childrens Corner Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • PG
    PAULINIAN GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • PB
    PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
6
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Aliados Health

See schedule o.aliados health is a regional association of 17 community health centers with sites in marin, napa, sonoma, contra costa, solano, and yolo counties. the organization was formed in 1994. our mission is to improve access to,…

Health
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maui United Way; the most unlike its peers is South Bay Chinese Service Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
21/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTER: $18,500 · OtherPHI BETA PSI UPSILON GAMMA CHAPTERANGELS OF HOPE: $13,000 · OtherANGELS OF HOPEUPSILON GAMMA PHI BETA PSI: $9,000 · OtherUPSILON GAMMA PHI BETA PSISECOND HARVEST FOOD BNK: $8,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BNKALAMEDA CO CMM FOOD BNK: $8,000 · OtherALAMEDA CO CMM FOOD BNKSOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB: $7,160 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTRY COMM FOOD BANK: $6,000 · OtherABC GLOBAL HEALTH: $5,000 · OtherLos Altos Mountain View Childrens Corner Inc: $5,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 · OtherVIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE: $6,000 · Other+35 more: $53,025 · Other+35 moreHappy Hollow Foundation: $19,000 · AnimalsHappy Hollow…EAST BAY SPCA: $6,500 · AnimalsEAST BAY SPC…HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 · AnimalsABCs for Global Health Inc: $13,000 · HealthABCs for Gl…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…LUPUS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthMAUI UNITED WAY: $21,500 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNIT…ABODE SERVICES: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 · InternationalMONTCLAIRE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $6,500 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $1,000 · Education
Other$148,685Animals$26,500Health$25,500Philanthropy$21,500Housing & Shelter$8,000International$7,500Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $21,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHappy Hollow Foundation: $19,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetABCs for Global Health Inc: $13,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB: $7,160 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY SPCA: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTCLAIRE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $6,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLos Altos Mountain View Childrens Corner Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING COMPASSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Happy Hollow Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ABCs for Global Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BAY CHINESE SERVICE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIRE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds VIVACE YOUTH CHORUS OF SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds Los Altos Mountain View Childrens Corner Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds FoundationCA18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Manny and Cecile Hernandez Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Manny and Cecile Hernandez Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Manny and Cecile Hernandez’s filings →

    More from the funding graph