Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
82
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Science & Tech$16MEducation$4.8MHealth$3.6MInternational$2.8MArts & Culture$1.4MSocial Science$381kPhilanthropy$250kCrime & Legal$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $495k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $650k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$8,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$500,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS AKA MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES$100,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART THE$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$100,000
ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION$100,000
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$50,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$40,000
NYU LANGONE HEALTH$37,500
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
PYLOS ARCHAEOLOGY FOUNDATION$25,000
THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE IRISH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$25,000
APPELLATE ADVOCATES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $5k → 8%YWCA GREENWICH INC: $10k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH INC: $10k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH: $10k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $10k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH: $10k → 9%VACLAV HAVEL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP THE: $15k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP THE: $10k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP THE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 48% of The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 22% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 54% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 86 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

86 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
57

Total granted

$25M
$3.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+29%

Still filing today

81%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $894k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureHealthSocial ScienceCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +63%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +54%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    5× · 2020–2024 · $813k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • HU
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $2.1M
  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $600k
  • BS
    BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $311k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amogerone Volunteer Fire Co #1 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development CentersJewish Community Organizati…Immigrant Worker SupportFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%29%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr11%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr11%52%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/125
the rest of the field
12%
6,333/52,167

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/122
Grantees still filing
82/122
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS — $15,702,000 · OtherAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENSHARVARD UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — $2,100,000 · OtherHARVARD UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICESWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE — $1,500,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE+89 more — $2,592,337 · Other+89 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,400,000 · InternationalInternatio…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $550,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $250,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON…AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA — $100,000 · InternationalNUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE INC — $95,000 · International+16 more — $409,240 · International+16 moreUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $1,155,000 · EducationUniversity…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $520,500 · EducationPresident …Cornell University — $450,000 · EducationCornell Un…ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $250,000 · EducationACHIEVEMEN…UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD IN AMERICA INC — $101,714 · Education+18 more — $311,265 · Education+18 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $813,000 · Arts & CultureSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE — $55,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more — $116,000 · Arts & CultureALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Social ScienceINSTITUTE FOR MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES — $124,100 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES — $105,000 · Social ScienceTHE INSTITUTE FOR NEW ECONOMIC THINKING INC — $100,000 · Social Science+3 more — $31,000 · Social ScienceDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $112,500 · HealthPLAN A HEALTH INC — $63,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITAL — $30,000 · Health+8 more — $76,000 · HealthROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $40,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$21,894,337International$2,804,240Education$2,788,479Arts & Culture$984,000Social Science$860,100Health$781,500Philanthropy$248,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,400,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $1,155,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $813,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $550,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $520,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $450,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $250,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES — $124,100 over 1y, 45% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $112,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES — $105,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD IN AMERICA INC — $101,714 over 3y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR NEW ECONOMIC THINKING INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR APPELLATE LITIGATION INC — $94,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC — $75,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe Foundation for a Civil Society LTD — $75,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN A HEALTH INC — $63,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC — $63,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE — $55,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAPPELLATE ADVOCATES — $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTCHILD INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $35,265 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEHUMANKINDNESS — $30,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA ↗
  • Who funds CODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR NEW ECONOMIC THINKING INC ↗
  • Who funds NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR APPELLATE LITIGATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for a Civil Society LTD ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds PLAN A HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC ↗
  • Who funds STERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds APPELLATE ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundThe Ford FoundationThe New York Communit…The Achelis & Bodman …Pinkerton FoundationRobin Hood FoundationMother Cabrini Health…The Hyde and Watson F…Silicon Valley Commun…The Rust Family Found…S & L Marx Foundation
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY21.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Rust Family Foundation · S & L Marx Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
  • Archaeological Institute of America — 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
  • Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Malcolm Hewitt Wiener Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 173 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines