Skip to content
The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

International$202kReligion$75kCivil Rights$70kPhilanthropy$63kArts & Culture$24kHealth$5kYouth Development$5kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA$15,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$13,901
CHABAD OF PARK CITY$10,500
PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE$2,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,500
FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA$1,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$1,000
THE FLANZER TRUST$500
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE MIND INSTITUTE: $500 → 9%FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW: $1k → 14%JFNAUIA: $1k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $15k → 9%JDRF: $500 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $118k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $10k → 12%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $2k → 13%CHABAD OF GAINESVILLE: $1k → 19%BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $9k → 11%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $25k → 5%BARNABUS HEALTH HOSPICE: $1k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $11k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $54k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $5k → 12%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM MIAMI: $4k → 15%BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $3k → 11%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $11k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $16k → 11%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM MIAMI: $2k → 15%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $10k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14k → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL OF GREATER MIAMI: $2k → 15%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $5k → 5%DESIGNING WOMEN BOTIQUE: $500 → 9%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMI: $650 → 15%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $3k → 5%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $3k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMI: $500 → 15%PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $2k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $2k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $1k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $900 → 5%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $2k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $750 → 5%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $2k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $1k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $1k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $750 → 9%MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +149% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$388k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2018–2022 · $202k · revenue +206%
  • PC
    Park City Performances
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +85%
  • EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +32%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL OF GREATER MIAMI
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • J
    JFNAUIA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Inc

To provide the diabetes research institute with the funding to cure diabetes now.

Health
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
11
Usdan Center for the Creative and Performing Arts

We invite people of all ages to experience the natural beauty of our campus and the transformative power of the arts. usdan was founded on jewish values that inspire us to make the world more just and more beautiful. when we welcome the…

Arts & Culture
12
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Embracing Our Differences Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $201,632 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMFRIENDS OF MARCH OF THE LIVING: $70,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MARCH OF THE LIVINGCHABAD OF PARK CITY: $55,250 · OtherCHABAD OF PARK CITYJEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $15,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDTEMPLE BETH EL: $6,000 · Other+24 more: $28,674 · Other+24 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $46,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH …+2 more: $700 · PhilanthropyBATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $11,000 · Arts & CulturePark City Performances: $5,650 · Arts & CultureEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50 · Arts & CultureRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $3,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 · HealthONE MIND: $500 · HealthPeople's Health Clicnic: $300 · HealthFACE AUTISM INC: $200 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $180 · HealthFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $1,000 · Religion
International$201,632Other$174,924Philanthropy$46,700Arts & Culture$20,700Education$3,000Health$1,680Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $201,632 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $46,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $11,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetPark City Performances: $5,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MIND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACE AUTISM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Park City Performances ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC ↗
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds ONE MIND ↗
  • Who funds ALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds FACE AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tillie Jennie & H…The Community Foundat…The Rubin Charitable …Gulf Coast Community …Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · The Rubin Charitable Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Malco’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home