Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

International$202kReligion$75kCivil Rights$70kPhilanthropy$63kArts & Culture$24kHealth$5kYouth Development$5kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA$15,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$13,901
CHABAD OF PARK CITY$10,500
PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE$2,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,500
TEMPLE BETH EL$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA$1,000
FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE FLANZER TRUST$500
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE MIND INSTITUTE: $500 → 9%FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW: $1k → 14%JFNAUIA: $1k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $15k → 9%JDRF: $500 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $118k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $10k → 12%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $2k → 13%CHABAD OF GAINESVILLE: $1k → 19%BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $9k → 11%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $25k → 5%BARNABUS HEALTH HOSPICE: $1k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $11k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $54k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $5k → 12%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM MIAMI: $4k → 15%BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY: $3k → 11%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $11k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $16k → 11%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM MIAMI: $2k → 15%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $10k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARA-MANA: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14k → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL OF GREATER MIAMI: $2k → 15%CHABAD OF PARK CITY: $5k → 5%DESIGNING WOMEN BOTIQUE: $500 → 9%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMI: $650 → 15%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $3k → 5%RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $3k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER MIAMI: $500 → 15%PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $2k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $2k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%PARK CITY PERFORMANCES DBA THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $1k → 5%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $900 → 5%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $2k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%THE EGYPTIAN THEATRE: $750 → 5%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $2k → 9%TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $1k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $1k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA: $750 → 9%MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MD
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$388k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +149% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$388k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2018–2022 · $202k · revenue +206%
  • PC
    Park City Performances
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +85%
  • EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +32%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL OF GREATER MIAMI
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • J
    JFNAUIA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Inc

To provide the diabetes research institute with the funding to cure diabetes now.

Health
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
11
Usdan Center for the Creative and Performing Arts

We invite people of all ages to experience the natural beauty of our campus and the transformative power of the arts. usdan was founded on jewish values that inspire us to make the world more just and more beautiful. when we welcome the…

Arts & Culture
12
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Embracing Our Differences Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $201,632 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMFRIENDS OF MARCH OF THE LIVING — $70,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MARCH OF THE LIVINGCHABAD OF PARK CITY — $55,250 · OtherCHABAD OF PARK CITYJEWISH NATIONAL FUND — $15,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDTEMPLE BETH EL — $6,000 · Other+24 more — $28,674 · Other+24 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $46,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH …+2 more — $700 · PhilanthropyBATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY — $11,000 · Arts & CulturePark City Performances — $5,650 · Arts & CultureEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC — $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $50 · Arts & CultureRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC — $3,000 · EducationONE MIND — $500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 · HealthPeople's Health Clicnic — $300 · HealthFACE AUTISM INC — $200 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $180 · HealthFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC — $1,000 · Religion
International$201,632Other$174,924Philanthropy$46,700Arts & Culture$20,700Education$3,000Health$1,680Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $201,632 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $46,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY — $11,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetPark City Performances — $5,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE MIND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH — $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACE AUTISM INC — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC
  • Who funds BATED BREATH THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds Park City Performances
  • Who funds EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc
  • Who funds ONE MIND
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds ALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH
  • Who funds FACE AUTISM INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · The Rubin Charitable Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Malco Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc1% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph