Skip to content

· Private foundation

The MacDonald Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$44kInternational$23kYouth Development$9kHousing & Shelter$4kCommunity Improvement$3kEducation$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$825
Median grant
6
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Truro Anglican Church$5,800
Individual grant recipient$2,465
Village of Hope and Love$1,025
Wycliffe Bible Translators$900
Marketplace Development Enterprise$900
SIM USA$825
The Navigator's$550
Modern Day$300
Young Life$300
CRU$275
The Lamb Center$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SALT Outreach: $600 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 16 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

$89k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalReligionEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AK
    ALL KIDS CAN LEARN INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $7k · revenue +91%
  • TL
    THE LAMB CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +167%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • M
    MDE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • TC
    The City Gates Church
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • DI
    DALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
5
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
6
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Tyndale Theological Seminary Inc Fka Tyndale International Mission

Provide a quality master's level education to approximately 60 degree program students and 20 non-degree students

Education
11
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
12
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is The International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRURO ANGLICAN CHURCH: $28,643 · OtherTRURO ANGLICAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $8,713 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $8,456 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCALL KIDS CAN LEARN INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,150 · OtherALL KIDS CAN LEARN INTERNATIONAL INCSIM USA INCORPORATED: $6,700 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATEDMDE: $5,750 · OtherMDESEND INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,956 · OtherHeart for Lebanon: $3,500 · OtherThe City Gates Church: $2,922 · Other+13 more: $11,250 · Other+13 moreVILLAGE OF HOPE AND LOVE: $6,689 · Youth DevelopmentVILLAGE O…YOUNG LIFE: $1,879 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…THE LAMB CENTER: $3,818 · EnvironmentDALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $2,046 · EducationHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationThe New School: $100 · EducationMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $1,525 · ReligionLAYMANS FOUNDATION INC: $350 · ReligionSalt Outreach Inc: $600 · Human ServicesMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $500 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100 · InternationalEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $103 · Civil Rights
Other$87,040Youth Development$8,568Environment$3,818Education$2,396Religion$1,875Human Services$600International$600Civil Rights$103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL KIDS CAN LEARN INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE OF HOPE AND LOVE: $6,689 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE LAMB CENTER: $3,818 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $2,046 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,879 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS: $1,525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSalt Outreach Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe International Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAYMANS FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WINESKINS MISSIONARY NETWORK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL KIDS CAN LEARN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF HOPE AND LOVE ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMB CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds Salt Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAYMANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW WINESKINS MISSIONARY NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The MacDonald Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The MacDonald Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The MacDonald Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The MacDonald Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MacDonald Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph