Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lyon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$781k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$305k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MEducation$1.3MHuman Services$587kYouth Development$491kArts & Culture$185kFood & Nutrition$128kCivil Rights$65kReligion$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $209k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $214k
  • $250k+1 grant · $305k
$8,850
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$305,000
Individual grant recipient$112,500
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$51,000
EMBARC$50,000
GATEWAY TO LEARNING$37,500
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$25,000
THE DOVETAIL PROJECT$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOC$20,363
THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES$20,000
ASCENSION IL FOUNDATION$20,000
THE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDAT$18,250
BY THE HAND CLUB FOR KIDS$11,410
MOD COLLECTIVE$11,150
EVERLOVED$10,100
UNITING VOICES CHICAGO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $391k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION: $526 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $52k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $51k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $46k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $448 → 14%GATEWAY TO LEARNING: $38k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $16k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
VA
AZ
AR
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 38 repeat orgs$472k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
60

Total granted

$4.0M
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+34%

Still filing today

74%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $199k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +4%
  • University of Chicago
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +34%
  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Services
    8× · 2017–2024 · $307k · revenue +332%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • SO
    SHIELD OF HOPE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
6
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
9
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired; the most unlike its peers is Hua Momona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/67
Grantees still filing
47/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,075,354 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC: $89,126 · HealthTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUND…PILOT LIGHT: $87,000 · HealthPILOT LIGHT+13 more: $75,144 · Health+13 moreUniversity of Chicago: $1,067,423 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School: $118,500 · EducationLawndale Educational and Region…+8 more: $78,695 · Education+8 moreIndividual grant recipient: $112,500 · OtherIndividual grant …BLOCKS TOGETHER - 360 NATION: $58,319 · OtherBLOCKS TOGETHER -…AMITA HEALTH: $51,177 · OtherAMITA HEALTHASCENSION IL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherASCENSION IL FOUN…Individual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant …ALEXIAN BROTHERS CENTER MENTAL HLTH: $37,500 · OtherALEXIAN BROTHERS …SHIELD OF HOPE SALVATION ARMY: $26,043 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,277 · Other+57 more: $305,050 · Other+57 moreEMBARC INC: $245,469 · Youth DevelopmentEMBARC INCUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $96,779 · Youth DevelopmentUNION LEAGUE…International Neighborhood Collaborative: $91,000 · Youth DevelopmentInternationa…BARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $41,926 · Youth DevelopmentBARRINGTON C…+3 more: $26,336 · Youth DevelopmentMetropolitan Family Services: $307,014 · Human ServicesMetropoli…GATEWAY TO LEARNING: $37,500 · Human ServicesGATEWAY T…Share our Spare: $16,324 · Human Services+6 more: $30,964 · Human Services+6 moreUNITING VOICES: $176,400 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $142,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $500 · Crime & Legal
Health$1,326,624Education$1,264,618Other$693,366Youth Development$501,510Human Services$391,802Arts & Culture$182,400Crime & Legal$142,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,075,354 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,067,423 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $307,014 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEMBARC INC: $245,469 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $176,400 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $142,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School: $118,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $96,779 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Neighborhood Collaborative: $91,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC: $89,126 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetPILOT LIGHT: $87,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetBARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $41,926 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetGATEWAY TO LEARNING: $37,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $34,484 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANET HOPE: $22,007 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetCulinary Care: $21,750 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $21,518 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $21,439 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $21,139 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,882 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZACHARY PLANTZ FOUNDATION: $18,531 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetDESIGNS FOR DIGNITY: $18,358 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetShare our Spare: $16,324 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetONEGOAL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNicholas D Sergi Foundation: $12,867 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $12,350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOD COLLECTIVE: $11,150 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $9,059 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $8,986 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $8,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,546 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION: $5,175 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHorizons for Youth: $2,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NELLER PUCCI FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $1,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds EMBARC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Lawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School ↗
  • Who funds UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds International Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds THE RYAN LICHT SANG BIPOLAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PILOT LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY TO LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANET HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Culinary Care ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ZACHARY PLANTZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESIGNS FOR DIGNITY ↗
  • Who funds Share our Spare ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds Nicholas D Sergi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOD COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL28.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · The Kadens Family Foundation · Cme Group Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lyon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lyon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lyon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lyon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lyon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph