Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Luke and Meadow France Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$483k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.2MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$93kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$25kInternational$14kHuman Services$9kReligion$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$325,000
GABRIELLES ANGEL FOUNDATION$100,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$55,000
GLOBAL ATHLETE PROJECT$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 38% of The Luke and Meadow France Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Luke and Meadow France Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 9 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$4.0M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-2%

Still filing today

89%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +78%
  • CG
    COLUMBIA GRAMMAR AND PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $420k · revenue +35%
  • PD
    PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $375k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • GW
    Girls With Impact Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • PG
    PRINCESS GRACE FOUNDATION - USAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue +155%
  • CF
    CALIPARI FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
The Laurence School

Laurence endeavors to develop the unique abilities and potential of each of its students in a diverse, inclusive and supportive learning community, where rich traditions and an innovative curriculum foster educational excellence and joy in…

Education
7
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
10
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
11
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
12
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gillen Brewer School and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%10%<5yr14%5%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr19%52%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr14%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr19%50%20–35yr12%5%35–55yr14%38%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
12%
4,885/39,682

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $2,190,943 · EducationGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR AND PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $420,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR AND PREPARATORY SCHOOLPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC — $375,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC+4 more — $222,500 · Education+4 moreGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC — $837,250 · PhilanthropyGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDA…PRINCESS GRACE FOUNDATION - USA — $90,000 · PhilanthropyPRINCESS GRACE FOUNDATIO…CALIPARI FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyNYU LANGONE HEALTH — $50,000 · OtherBREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION (BCRF) — $50,000 · OtherWIZO — $13,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $7,500 · Other+9 more — $13,500 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $55,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · HealthFIND THE CAUSE INC — $3,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsJunior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc — $10,000 · International
Education$3,208,443Philanthropy$977,250Other$134,500Health$85,000Public Safety & Disaster$40,000Recreation & Sports$20,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $2,190,943 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC — $837,250 over 5y, 16% of budgetCOLUMBIA GRAMMAR AND PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $420,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC — $375,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCURRIKI — $100,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetGirls With Impact Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIPARI FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAllegro Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIND THE CAUSE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILLEN BREWER SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Luke and Meadow France Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Luke and Meadow France Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Luke and Meadow France Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph