Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ludwig and Nancy Sternberger Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$575k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MArts & Culture$1.1MEnvironment$310kYouth Development$186kHuman Services$85kHealth$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $444k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$200,000
LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION INC$90,000
WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$54,000
LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION INC$50,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$50,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$28,500
VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC$25,000
GIRLS FOR A CHANGE$25,000
HOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT INC$15,000
ART WITH A HEART INC$10,000
INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION$10,000
INFORMED EXPERIENCES INC$7,500
CHESTNUT RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY$5,000
WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ART WITH A HEART INC: $10k → 19%ART WITH A HEART INC: $10k → 19%ART WITH A HEART INC: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 15 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$4.2M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+32%

Still filing today

73%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +42%
  • TW
    THE WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $484k · revenue +48%
  • TV
    THE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $203k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • BA
    BALTIMORE AREA COUNCIL #220 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington County Museum of Fine Arts

The mission is implemented through: intentional art collecting in the focus areas of american art and world cultures, barrier free public access and free admission to art collections of national importance, vigilant preservation and…

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
Fort Wayne Museum of Art Inc

The fort wayne museum of art will collect, preserve and present american and related art to engage and educate broad and diverse audiences throughout the region and add value to their lives.

Arts & Culture
4
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
5
Bainbridge Island Museum of Art

Bainbridge island museum of art (bima) inspires curiosity, wonder and understanding by connecting people with the contemporary art and craft of the puget sound region.

Arts & Culture
6
Boise Art Museum Inc

To create visual arts experiences that engage people and inspire learning through exceptional exhibitions, collections, and educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
7
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
8
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
9
Muscarelle Museum of Art Foundation

The mission of the muscarelle museum of art is to foster the full integration of a dynamic art museum into the life and liberal arts mission of william & mary and to serve as a model of curatorial excellence and a catalyst for art…

Arts & Culture
10
Washington Project for the Arts Inc

Washington project for the arts, inc. (wpa) supports artist-driven projects, advocacy, and dialogue so that artists can live, work, and flourish.

Arts & Culture
11
Washington County Arts Council Inc

Promotes the arts and related activities at local, state and national levels

—
12
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION INC: $1,150,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION INCTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $203,000 · OtherTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INCINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $187,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATIONGIRLS FOR A CHANGE: $170,000 · OtherGIRLS FOR A CHANGETROUT UNLIMITED: $82,190 · Other+9 more: $121,500 · Other+9 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,265,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN: $483,742 · Arts & CultureTHE WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM …WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $169,000 · Arts & CultureWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUN…MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $140,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FO…BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ARTHOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT: $72,500 · HealthTHE CHESTNUT RIDGE VOL FIRE COMPANY: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterArt With a Heart Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $10,000 · Environment
Other$1,913,690Education$1,265,000Arts & Culture$892,742Health$72,500Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Human Services$25,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,265,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN: $483,742 over 5y, 21% of budgetTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $203,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $187,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $169,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT: $72,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetTHE CHESTNUT RIDGE VOL FIRE COMPANY: $50,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetArt With a Heart Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE AREA COUNCIL #220 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELIEVE IN MUSIC INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGUNPOWDER VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE WHEELWRIGHT MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHESTNUT RIDGE VOL FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Art With a Heart Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE AREA COUNCIL #220 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IN MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GUNPOWDER VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ludwig and Nancy Sternberger Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ludwig and Nancy Sternberger Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Gunpowder Valley Conservancy Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art: 4% of income from government
  • Art With a Heart Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ludwig and Nancy Sternberger’s filings →

More from the funding graph