Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Loucks Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$184kArts & Culture$68kRecreation & Sports$24kHuman Services$22kFood & Nutrition$17kEducation$14kYouth Development$9kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$490k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ronald McDonald House Char$11,000
Children's Hospital Foundation$3,500
VCU Massey Center$2,100
Camp No Worries$2,000
Health Brigade$2,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$2,000
Science Museum of Virginia$1,500
Children's Museum of Richmond$1,500
Doctors Without Borders$1,500
Smithsonian Institution$1,500
Reading is Fundamental$1,500
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts$1,000
Girls on the Run of Greater Richmon$1,000
Sports Backers$1,000
Feed More$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Human Rights Initiative: $1k → 14%Deschutes Children's Foundation: $1k → 10%Obon Society: $200 → 13%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $500 → 12%Backpacks of Love: $500 → 6%Human Rights Initiative: $1k → 14%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $100 → 12%Backpacks of Love: $500 → 6%Human Rights Initiative: $1k → 14%Human Rights Initiative: $1k → 14%Human Rights Initiative: $500 → 14%Human Rights Initiative: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
MA
OR
IA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 49 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
12

Total granted

$347k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+10%

Still filing today

49%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CAMP NO WORRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +76%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +154%
  • HB
    HEALTH BRIGADE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • DC
    DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • MA
    MAUI ARTS LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +479%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Richmond Symphony

The richmond symphony performs, teaches and champions music to inspire and unite our communities.

Arts & Culture
2
The Richmond Ballet

Through all of its programs, richmond ballet strives to expand access to dance for the benefit of the entire community. at the heart of the organization's mission, to awaken, uplift, and unite human spirits, is the conviction that the…

Arts & Culture
3
Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce

Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.

—
4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
6
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
7
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
8
Maymont Foundation

The maymont foundation is committed to creating experiences that delight, educate and inspire.

Arts & Culture
9
Childsavers- Memorial Child Guidance Clinic

The organization guides the community's children through life's critical moments with trauma-informed mental health and child development services. it believes that all children can be safe, happy, healthy and ready to learn.

—
10
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
11
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
12
Science Museum of Virginia Foundation Inc

The science museum of virginia foundation, inc. serves as the private fundraising partner of the science museum of virginia, a state institution that was founded in 1970 by both the virginia academy of science and the virginia general…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers; the most unlike its peers is Meadowlark Arts Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ronald McDonald House Char: $63,250 · OtherRonald McDonald House CharVCU Massey Center: $18,600 · OtherVCU Massey CenterMD Anderson Cancer Center: $18,000 · OtherMD Anderson Cancer CenterIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherASK Childhood Center: $13,000 · OtherHEALTH BRIGADE: $12,500 · OtherScience Museum of Virginia: $11,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Charities: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $97,300 · Other+33 moreCAMP NO WORRIES INC: $15,500 · HealthCAMP NO W…Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $14,000 · HealthChildren'…+2 more: $1,000 · HealthChildren's Museum of Richmond: $10,500 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $8,500 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE: $4,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,200 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsFriends of Pocahontas State Park: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP TO BELONG: $500 · Recreation & SportsOPERATION SMILE INC: $7,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesBACKPACKS OF LOVE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Red River Valley: $600 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesFEED MORE INC: $8,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$257,150Health$30,500Arts & Culture$24,700Recreation & Sports$13,000International$12,500Human Services$9,300Food & Nutrition$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP NO WORRIES INC: $15,500 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE: $12,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $10,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTERFIELD FOOD BANK OUTREACH CENTER: $4,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLADNEY FUND: $4,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTI CENTER: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND AREA BICYCLING ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE VIRGINIA: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Pocahontas State Park: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBACKPACKS OF LOVE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAUI ARTS LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMIDLOTHIAN HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEADOWLARK ARTS COUNCIL INC: $700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of the Red River Valley: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP TO BELONG: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP NO WORRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERFIELD FOOD BANK OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY FUND ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND AREA BICYCLING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE VIRGINIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pauley Family FoundationVA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pauley Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Robins Foundation · Carmax Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Tesco Foundation · Altria Companies Employee Community Fund · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · John Randolph Foundation Support Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Loucks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Loucks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loucks Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph