Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Loats Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$54kHealth$47kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INC$60,000
HOOD COLLEGE$21,000
FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FNDN INC$20,000
MCDANIEL COLLEGE$13,000
WEE FOLK SCHOOL$12,000
MOTHER SETON SCHOOL$12,000
SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$9,000
MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY$9,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MD$8,000
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,000
MAR LU RIDGE$7,000
CALVARY WEEKDAY SCHOOL$5,000
HEARTLY HOUSE INC$5,000
STEVENSON COLLEGE$4,000
SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Loats Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 85%.

The Loats Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOOD COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $132k · revenue +31%
  • FS
    FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +182%
  • MC
    MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SU
    SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $9k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
3
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
4
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Marymount University

Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

—
10
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
11
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Saint Mary's University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INC: $380,000 · OtherFREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INCMOTHER SETON SCHOOL INC: $75,000 · OtherMOTHER SETON SCHOOL INCWEE FOLK SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherWEE FOLK SCHOOLMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MD: $47,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MDCARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $46,000 · OtherCARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGECALVARY WEEKDAY SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherMar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc: $30,000 · Other+4 more: $67,000 · Other+4 moreHOOD COLLEGE: $132,000 · EducationHOOD COLLEGEFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $125,000 · EducationFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $81,000 · EducationMCDANIEL COLLEGE INCYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $34,000 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIAMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $28,000 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INCSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · Education+1 more: $9,000 · EducationHEARTLY HOUSE INC: $30,000 · Human Services
Other$740,000Education$428,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOOD COLLEGE: $132,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $125,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $81,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $34,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLY HOUSE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOOD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT ↗
  • Who funds MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nora Roberts FoundationMD15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nora Roberts Foundation · The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Delaplaine Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Loats Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Loats Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Stevenson University: 0% of income from government
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Loats Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Loats Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loats’ filings →

More from the funding graph