Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Loats Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$54kHealth$47kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INC$60,000
HOOD COLLEGE$21,000
FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FNDN INC$20,000
MCDANIEL COLLEGE$13,000
WEE FOLK SCHOOL$12,000
MOTHER SETON SCHOOL$12,000
SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$9,000
MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY$9,000
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MD$8,000
MAR LU RIDGE$7,000
CALVARY WEEKDAY SCHOOL$5,000
HEARTLY HOUSE INC$5,000
STEVENSON COLLEGE$4,000
SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of The Loats Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Loats Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOOD COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $132k · revenue +31%
  • FS
    FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +182%
  • MC
    MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SU
    SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $9k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
3
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

4
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Marymount University

Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

10
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
11
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Saint Mary's University Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INC — $380,000 · OtherFREDERICK COMM COLLEGE FNDN INCMOTHER SETON SCHOOL INC — $75,000 · OtherMOTHER SETON SCHOOL INCWEE FOLK SCHOOL — $65,000 · OtherWEE FOLK SCHOOLMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MD — $47,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF FRED CO MDCARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $46,000 · OtherCARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGECALVARY WEEKDAY SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherMar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc — $30,000 · Other+4 more — $67,000 · Other+4 moreHOOD COLLEGE — $132,000 · EducationHOOD COLLEGEFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT — $125,000 · EducationFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC — $81,000 · EducationMCDANIEL COLLEGE INCYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $34,000 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIAMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC — $28,000 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INCSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY — $19,000 · Education+1 more — $9,000 · EducationHEARTLY HOUSE INC — $30,000 · Human Services
Other$740,000Education$428,000Human Services$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOOD COLLEGE — $132,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT — $125,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC — $81,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $34,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLY HOUSE INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc — $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC — $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOOD COLLEGE
  • Who funds FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT
  • Who funds MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds HEARTLY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Mar-Lu-Ridge Camp and Retreat Center Inc
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC
  • Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nora Roberts FoundationMD15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nora Roberts Foundation · The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Delaplaine Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Loats Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Stevenson University0% of income from government
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Loats Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Loats Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph