Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lj Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$420kInternational$194kReligion$146kEnvironment$135kPhilanthropy$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kRecreation & Sports$105kYouth Development$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDERS PLEDGE$32,850
NOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS$25,000
DIRECT RELIEF$20,000
VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER$20,000
ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION$15,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$15,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$12,150
ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF JAMES RIVER PARK$5,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
HOPE CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLEAN AIR TASKFORCE: $20k → 16%WELL DONE FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%CENTER FOR EFFECTIVE ALTRUISM: $80k → 10%INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $20k → 11%DIRECT RELIEF: $20k → 14%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%MEMORIAL DRIVE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 16%TABLETOCHKI CHARITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%KNOXVILLE CANCER SUPPORT: $30k → 12%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%RICHMOND HILL: $75k → 7%ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS: $15k → 19%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $30k → 22%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%FOUNDERS PLEDGE: $40k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF HURRICANE FLORENCE: $20k → 14%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $10k → 12%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS: $10k → 19%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $20k → 22%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%FOUNDERS PLEDGE: $33k → 10%ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS: $10k → 19%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $20k → 22%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%VCU MASSEY CANCER: $20k → 22%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $20k → 22%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $20k → 22%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%VCU HEALTH: $70k → 22%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%VCU MASSEY CANCER: $20k → 22%ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $15k → 22%VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $20k → 22%JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $15k → 22%VCU MASSEY CANCER: $15k → 22%RICHMOND HILL: $15k → 9%NOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MA
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 18 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+26%

Still filing today

56%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Against Malaria Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +29%
  • AC
    ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +311%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR EFFECTIVE ALTRUISM
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • VH
    VCU HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Conquer cancer funds research for every type of cancer to benefit every patient, everywhere. working in collaboration with a global network of top scientists and clinicians, and leading advocacy and research organizations, conquer cancer…

Health
2
Cancer Action Coalition of Virginia Inc

The mission of cacv is to reduce the burden of cancer for all persons living in virginia utilizing the virginia cancer plan to provide a forum for collaboration, education, and advocacy.

Health
3
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
6
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
7
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
8
The Virtue Foundation

Virtue foundation's mission is to increase awareness, inspire action, and render assistance through initiatives on healthcare, education, and women and justice programs, as well as innovative work in research and analytics.

Public Benefit
9
Water Environment Federation

WEF's mission is inspiring the water community in pursuit of human and environmental well-being. WEF is a global environmental leader committed to water quality education and technical best practices. WEF connects water professionals;…

Environment
10
Friends of Cancer Research

To drive collaboration among partners from every healthcare sector to power advances in science, policy and regulation that speed life-saving treatments to patients.

Health
11
Reef Check Foundation

Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.

Environment
12
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Well Done Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $140,000 · OtherST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITALVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $130,000 · OtherVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTERASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR EFFECTIVE ALTRUISM: $80,000 · OtherCENTER FOR EFFECTIVE ALTRUISMFOUNDERS PLEDGE: $73,000 · OtherFOUNDERS PLEDGEVCU HEALTH: $70,000 · OtherVCU HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $43,000 · OtherST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $41,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF JAMES RIVER PARK: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+7 more: $63,000 · Other+7 moreThe Against Malaria Foundation: $124,000 · HealthThe Against M…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE…JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentJAMES RIVE…CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR …Well Done Foundation Inc: $15,000 · EnvironmentWell Done …RICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED: $92,000 · ReligionDIRECT RELIEF: $40,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE ACTION: $30,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $20,000 · InternationalVIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsNOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$865,000Health$164,000Environment$135,000Religion$92,000International$90,000Recreation & Sports$65,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $124,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetRICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED: $92,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $43,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS: $40,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWell Done Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARKS ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds NOVA OF VIRGINIA AQUATICS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Well Done Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY EAST TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lj Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lj Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lj Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lj Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lj Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph