Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Living Water Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
21
Organizations funded FY2023
19%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$17,500
Organizations funded a year
19 to 35
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
6
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations The Living Water Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$54k10%
FY202321$113k19%
FY202219$115k21%
FY202129$121k28%
FY202027$92k30%
FY201927$144k37%
FY201828$94k43%
FY201735$128kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$214kYouth Development$212kRecreation & Sports$167kHuman Services$101kEducation$84kHealth$41kInternational$31kCrime & Legal$13kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
NV
OH
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Young Life$186,78080%
The Scga Foundation$161,30081%
Cyclical Inc$33,82562%
Lighthouse Church Inc$24,0001n/a
Insignia Foundation$21,50082%
Westminster Free Clinic$17,35570%
Colina Middle School Ptsa$13,20058%
Saving Innocence Inc$8,00030%
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$4,00070%
University of Illinois Foundation$3,60020%
Show all 37 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 45 recipients with no EIN on record ($359k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Living Water Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYoung Life: $186,780 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Scga Foundation: $161,300 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCyclical Inc: $33,825 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetInsignia Foundation: $21,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetWestminster Free Clinic: $17,355 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetColina Middle School Ptsa: $13,200 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetSaving Innocence Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLinks Players International Inc: $3,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInterface Children Family Services: $3,010 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHarbor House: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe James Storehouse Incorporated: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFaith in Practice: $1,517 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBellevue University: $1,501 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEncouragement International Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJbfc Inc Dba Mainspringsjbfc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson's Foundation Inc: $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPepperdine University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBecause of Hope: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWhitworth University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFixn Fidos Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThinspace Africa: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNavy-Marine Corps Relief Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhen We All Vote: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 32.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conrad N Hilton FoundationCA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conrad N Hilton Foundation · California Community Foundation · Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Living Water Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Living Water Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Living Water Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Living Water Foundation

How much does The Living Water Foundation give?
The Living Water Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $53,951 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 35 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Living Water Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (24%), Youth Development (24%), Recreation & Sports (19%).
Who are The Living Water Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Young Life ($187k), The Scga Foundation ($161k), Cyclical Inc ($34k).
Does The Living Water Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Living Water Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Living Water Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Conrad N Hilton Foundation, California Community Foundation, Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation.
Where is The Living Water Foundation based?
The Living Water Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Living Water’s filings →

More from the funding graph