Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Littlestar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$672kFood & Nutrition$75kHealth$44kArts & Culture$43kReligion$32kYouth Development$23kHuman Services$15kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DAF$90,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TRANSFORMATION HOUSE: $6k → 7%TRANSFORMATION HOUSE: $6k → 7%TRANSFORMATION HOUSE: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
CO
KY
KS
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$686k · 12 repeat orgs$240k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -48% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$686k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-48%

Still filing today

58%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD
    4× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +45%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
    4× · 2018–2021 · $23k · revenue +77%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • II
    IMPACT INVESTING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $160k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • SP
    STORY PARTNERS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redeeming Justice Network

Houston Legal Aid Center protects and advances the rights of the poor through the poor through the provision of pro bono or reduced cost legal services while also addressing the underlying spiritual and relational issues affecting…

Civil Rights
2
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
6
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
7
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
8
First Baptist Denton Ministry Center

The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…

Health
9
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
10
Tender Life Maternity Home

Tender Life is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help and hope for women during their pregnancies and beyond.

Housing & Shelter
11
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
12
Healing Hearts Ministries International

Post-abortive and family crisis counseling via small groups, email, and publications; focus is to bring healing and forgiveness in a supportive, Christ-centered environment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Project Red. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DAF: $423,400 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DAFIMPACT INVESTING FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherIMPACT INVESTING FOUNDATIONTHE NAVIGATORS: $30,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MEDICAL DENTAL ASSOC: $26,400 · Other+15 more: $124,830 · Other+15 moreHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $75,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUN…PROJECT MERCY INC: $18,000 · InternationalProject RED: $13,000 · InternationalORPHAN'S TREE INC: $5,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentTransformation House: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING: $12,648 · Arts & Culture
Other$764,630Food & Nutrition$75,000International$36,000Youth Development$23,000Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$12,648

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $75,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $23,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MERCY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTransformation House: $15,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetProject RED: $13,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GATHERING: $12,648 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRe Cancer: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetORPHAN'S TREE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Transformation House ↗
  • Who funds Project RED ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Re Cancer ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN'S TREE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Littlestar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Littlestar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Littlestar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph