Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lipnick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$31kFood & Nutrition$16kPhilanthropy$7kHuman Services$6kInternational$5kCrime & Legal$3kHealth$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$916
Median grant
4
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE EMANU EL$5,200
Individual grant recipient$4,330
PROJECT LAMPLIGHT$2,500
EDMONDS FOOD BANK$1,800
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$1,500
TULANE HILLEL$916
Individual grant recipient$704
UNDIES FOR EVERYONE$500
HOUSTON AREA PARKINSONS SOCIETY$350
MFAH$340
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$275
AMERICAN RED CROSS$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT LAMPLIGHT: $3k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $700 → 16%MALI NIETA FDN: $4k → 16%KIDS MEALS: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 15 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
28

Total granted

$93k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+1%

Still filing today

20%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $24k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU EL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k

Funded once

  • HH
    Houston Hillelgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +102%
  • MN
    MALI NIETA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • TA
    TX ACCESS TO JUSTICE FD
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
4
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

—
5
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
6
Houston Academy of Medicine

The mission of the Houston Academy of Medicine is to support the community service, education, scientific, and charitable programs for physicians, their patients, and the community at large in Harris County.

Education
7
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
8
American Leadership Forum Houston Gulf Coast Chapter

American Leadership Forum (ALF) brings together, in classes, leaders with diverse perspectives so they can build relationships, learn to dialogue and respectfully differ, and work together for the good of our community.

—
9
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
10
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
11
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
12
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,345 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $24,154 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE EMANU EL: $11,045 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU ELJEWISH FED OF GREATER HOUSTON: $9,000 · OtherJEWISH FED OF GREATER HOUSTONThe Houston Food Bank: $5,225 · OtherThe Houston Food BankMFAH: $3,720 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+29 more: $15,320 · Other+29 moreHouston Hillel: $19,000 · ReligionHouston HillelMALI NIETA FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT LAMP LIGHT: $2,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $700 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesUndies for Everyone: $5,500 · PhilanthropyEDMONDS FOOD BANK: $1,800 · Food & NutritionCHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC: $1,210 · InternationalPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $120 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $100 · HealthCaringBridge: $100 · Health
Other$97,309Religion$19,000Human Services$6,900Philanthropy$5,500Food & Nutrition$1,800International$1,210Health$520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHouston Hillel: $19,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUndies for Everyone: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $5,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMALI NIETA FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPROJECT LAMP LIGHT: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEDMONDS FOOD BANK: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC: $1,210 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $916 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Hospice: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Houston Hillel ↗
  • Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds MALI NIETA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LAMP LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds EDMONDS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Houston Hospice ↗
  • Who funds Houston Area Parkinson Society ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable FoundationTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lipnick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lipnick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lipnick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph