Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Linden Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$457kHuman Services$410kEducation$343kInternational$274kYouth Development$225kReligion$60kHousing & Shelter$45kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STORYTELLER CHILDREN'S CENTER$35,000
SHELTER BOX$30,000
DIRECT RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$30,000
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$30,000
TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S FAMILY CENTER$20,000
ANGELS FOSTER CARE$20,000
HOPE HARBOR$15,000
GLOBAL ARTS CORP$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTER BOX: $25k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $20k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $10k → 10%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $20k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $15k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $15k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%SHELTER BOX: $35k → 14%SHELTER BOX: $35k → 14%SHELTER BOX: $30k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $210k · revenue +123%
  • TB
    TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +52%
  • SC
    STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOOK AT US ALLIANCE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · 38% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
2
The Miracle Foundation Inc

A family for every child in our lifetime.

Health
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
God's Littlest Angels Inc

God's littlest angels facilitates the development of healthy kids, empowered families, and stronger communities while sharing the hope and love of jesus christ.

International
5
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
6
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
7
Hopehouse International Inc

Hopehouse international provides aid and housing to families adopting orphans in ukraine and adjacent european countries.

International
8
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
9
All for Kids Organization

This year, all for kids provided 70,000 at-risk children and parents living in los angeles and orange counties with services that include school readiness, parenting classes, family resource centers, support groups, mental health…

Human Services
10
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
11
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
12
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Family Services Center; the most unlike its peers is Hope Harbor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $175,000 · OtherSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INCALZHEIMER'S FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $140,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S FAMILY SERVICES CENTERSTORYTELLER: $130,000 · OtherSTORYTELLERHOPE HARBOR: $90,000 · OtherHOPE HARBORALZHEIMER'S FAMILY CENTER: $70,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S FAMILY CENTERFOREST HOME CONFERENCE CTR: $60,000 · OtherFOREST HOME CONFERENCE CTRLaurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor: $45,000 · OtherLaurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor+1 more: $20,500 · OtherSHELTERBOX USA INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INCANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $110,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER CARE OF …AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $40,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN WOMEN RISINGDIRECT RELIEF: $150,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFMercy Ships International: $45,000 · InternationalMercy Ships In…AWARENESS CAMBODIA USA: $38,990 · InternationalAWARENESS CAMB…TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $190,000 · HealthTEDDY BEAR CAN…HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $36,000 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL …THE PAINTED TURTLE: $225,050 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED T…ROOM TO READ: $38,000 · EducationGLOBAL ARTS CORPORATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$730,500Human Services$360,000International$233,990Health$226,000Youth Development$225,050Education$38,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $225,050 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $210,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $175,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $140,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $110,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetHOPE HARBOR: $90,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLaurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor: $45,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetAFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAWARENESS CAMBODIA USA: $38,990 over 3y, 34% of budgetROOM TO READ: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOOK AT US ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $20,500 over 1y, 38% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FAMILY SERVICES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WOMEN RISING ↗
  • Who funds AWARENESS CAMBODIA USA ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOOK AT US ALLIANCE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ARTS CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Linden Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Linden Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Linden Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Linden Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Linden Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph