Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lillian Sherwood Griswold Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$655kCrime & Legal$500kEnvironment$337kReligion$222kHousing & Shelter$200kSocial Science$125kPublic Benefit$79kEducation$57kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$6,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARNARD COLLEGE$19,750
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION$18,000
RESCUE WOMEN VIA GLOBAL PEARL LLC$10,000
REACH EDUCATION INC$8,000
SUBJECT MATTER$8,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$7,500
LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF WYOMING EDUCATION FUND$6,500
WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL$5,000
CALIFORNIA INCLUSIVE SAILING$5,000
CHELSEA'S FUND$5,000
IPAS$5,000
APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL$2,500
WINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REACH EDUCATION INC: $8k → 14%APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL: $5k → 17%APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL: $5k → 17%APPLE VALLEY SCHOOL: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
NY
WY
CA
VA
NM
NC
DC
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$1.7M
$483k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+11%

Still filing today

54%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $48k · revenue +78%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k · revenue +13%
  • CF
    CHELSEA'S FUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $19k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • FF
    FAMILIES FORWARDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +49%
  • PD
    PAUL D WHITE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • RC
    REDEMPTION CHURCH OF COSTA MESA
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
3
New West Charter School

The mission of new west charter school is to provide an academically rigorous, highly individualized education for 21st century students in grades 6 - 12. in the decades to come, personal success will require increasingly high levels of…

Education
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
8
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

9
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
10
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Scientific Being Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCIENTIFIC BEING RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $654,759 · OtherSCIENTIFIC BEING RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCFOR GOODNESS SAKE — $500,000 · OtherFOR GOODNESS SAKEALTERNATIVE ENERGY INSTITUTE INC — $293,527 · OtherALTERNATIVE ENERGY INSTITUTE INCFAMILIES FORWARD — $200,000 · OtherFAMILIES FORWARDPAUL D WHITE INSTITUTE — $125,000 · OtherPAUL D WHITE INSTITUTEDAYSTAR — $122,000 · OtherDAYSTARREDEMPTION CHURCH OF COSTA MESA — $100,000 · Other+14 more — $111,773 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $48,000 · Public BenefitBARNARD COLLEGE — $28,500 · EducationDaraja Education Fund — $10,000 · EducationTHE NORTHSOUND ASSOCIATION FOR CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP MURPHY HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationAPPLE VALLEY SCHOOL — $12,500 · Human ServicesREACH EDUCATION INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesCHELSEA'S FUND — $19,400 · Civil RightsSUBJECT MATTER INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $7,500 · Arts & CultureJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION — $5,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 · HealthCIRCLE OF HOPE HEALTH CARE SVCS INC — $600 · Health
Other$2,107,059Public Benefit$48,000Education$43,500Human Services$20,500Civil Rights$19,400Arts & Culture$15,500Health$10,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCIENTIFIC BEING RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $654,759 over 3y, 59% of budgetALTERNATIVE ENERGY INSTITUTE INC — $293,527 over 4y, 96% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $200,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $28,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHELSEA'S FUND — $19,400 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAPPLE VALLEY SCHOOL — $12,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDaraja Education Fund — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOR OUR COUNTRY - UNITED STATES — $8,273 over 3y, 100% of budgetREACH EDUCATION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSUBJECT MATTER INC — $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIPAS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTHSOUND ASSOCIATION FOR CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP MURPHY HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsland Christian Academy — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE HEALTH CARE SVCS INC — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lillian Sherwood Griswold Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lillian Sherwood Griswold Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lillian Sherwood Griswold Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph