Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lever Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$404k
Granted FY2022
38
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$374k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$391kEducation$147kReligion$69kHuman Services$19kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$8kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k36 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $374k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEVER FAMILY FUND$373,933
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL TRADE SCHOOL$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$5,500
STANFORD UNIVERSITYSCHOOL OF MEDICINE$1,000
US VETS$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
UNICEF$500
LEGAL AID FOUNDATION LOS ANGELES$500
ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$500
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$500
UC BERKELEY$500
COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYS FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%HONORBOUND FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%GUIDING EYS FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%HONORBOUND FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%HONORBOUND FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%CORE: $1k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $100 → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $500 → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $500 → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $500 → 14%US VETS: $1k → 14%US VETS: $1k → 14%US VETS: $1k → 14%PAWSLA: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CT
CA
TN
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 31 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
4

Total granted

$268k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+26%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +145%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +197%
  • US
    UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF LA
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • C
    CORE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100 · revenue +246%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
7
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
8
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
9
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
10
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
11
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
12
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEVER FAMILY FUND: $373,933 · OtherLEVER FAMILY FUNDJEWISH EDUCATIONAL TRADE SCHOOL: $130,000 · OtherJEWISH EDUCATIONAL TRADE SCHOOLCHEDER MENACHEM: $40,000 · OtherCHEDER MENACHEMVALLEY BETH SHALOM: $27,300 · Other+21 more: $57,075 · Other+21 moreCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesHONOR BOUND FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCORE: $1,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,500 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,325 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,300 · Health+3 more: $250 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,250 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $800 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $450 · Housing & ShelterOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $450 · Housing & ShelterCLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$628,308Human Services$10,550Education$10,500Health$5,875International$5,150Housing & Shelter$900Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR BOUND FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT LOS ANGELES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR BOUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lever Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lever Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lever Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph