Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Tides Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $30k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

32
’19
32
’20
31
’21
31
’22
25
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$331kArts & Culture$91kPublic Benefit$20kEducation$17kCivil Rights$10kEnvironment$8kCrime & Legal$4kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Land Alliance Inc$6,000
Berkeley Symphony Orchestra$2,000
Reproductive Freedom for All$1,500
San Francisco Mime Troupe$1,000
Inequality Media$1,000
Marin Shakespeare Company$1,000
The Paul Dresher Ensemble$1,000
Shotgun Players$1,000
California Lawyers for the Arts$1,000
KQED$1,000
Berkeley Public Library Foundation$1,000
San Francisco Playhouse$1,000
Center for Media and Democracy$1,000
Aurora Theatre Co$1,000
University of Chicago$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Trusteeship Institute Inc: $500 → 14%Courage California Institute: $500 → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $2k → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $1k → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $2k → 14%Reproductive Freedom for All: $2k → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$144k · 45 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
23

Total granted

$144k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+44%

Still filing today

71%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +46%
  • SF
    San Francisco Playhouse
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +64%
  • SP
    Shotgun Players
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • W
    WEDO
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • RE
    RootsAction Education Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Aurora Theatre Company

Aurora Theatre Company inspires new audiences and longtime theatre lovers alike with the visceral power of live theatre. Our venues, the most intimate professional stages in the Bay Area, highlight great acting, nuanced language, and an…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Bay Area Theatre Company

Sfbatco unites artists and audiences through live theatre that is reflective of the authentic perspectives and history of the san francisco bay area.

Arts & Culture
3
Cutting Ball Theater

The description of Cutting Ball Theater's mission starts on Form 990 Page 1 and continues on Schedule O

Arts & Culture
4
Silicon Valley Shakespeare

Silicon valley shakespeare is innovating the classics through unique and relevant theatrical experiences that illuminate and inspire modern audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
6
Opera Parallle

Opera Parallle presents compelling performances of contemporary operas with high musical and dramatic standards, embracing modern aesthetics, creative use of technology, and social relevance as essential to the future of the art form.…

Arts & Culture
7
The Studio Theatre Inc

Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.

Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Performances Inc

SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.

Arts & Culture
9
New Conservatory Theatre Center

To champion innovative, high-quality productions & educational theatre experiences for youth, artists, and the queer & allied communities to effect personal & societal growth, enlightenment and change.

Arts & Culture
10
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
11
Center for the Art of Translation

Bay Area community and increases access to literature locally and globally. The Centers publications, events, and educational programming build audiences for literature in translation, enrich the library of vital literary works, nurture…

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Playground; the most unlike its peers is Poetry Flash. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
33/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIDES FOUNDATION: $330,531 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,400 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR MEDIA …BERKELEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $8,500 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY SYMPHONY…DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NOW PRO…San Francisco Playhouse: $7,000 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Pla…Shotgun Players: $6,200 · Arts & CultureShotgun PlayersPLAYGROUND: $4,350 · Arts & CulturePLAYGROUNDKQED INC: $4,300 · Arts & CultureKQED INCCalifornia Lawyers for the Arts: $4,000 · Arts & CultureINEQUALITY MEDIA: $4,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $3,700 · Arts & Culture+17 more: $18,500 · Arts & Culture+17 moreAurora Theatre Co: $7,000 · OtherAurora Theat…SAN FRANCISCO MIME TROUPE INC: $5,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISC…KPFA: $5,000 · OtherKPFATHEATRE FIRST: $4,000 · OtherTHEATRE FIRS…Eugene O'Neill Foundation: $4,000 · OtherEugene O'Nei…THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE: $3,500 · OtherTHE INTERNAT…The Paul Dresher Ensemble: $2,800 · OtherWISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC: $2,000 · Other+28 more: $19,600 · Other+28 moreREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $7,000 · Human ServicesCOURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE C3: $500 · Human ServicesTRUST FUNDS FOR ALL CHILDREN INC: $500 · Human ServicesUniversity of Chicago: $4,500 · EducationThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $2,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,000 · EducationTHE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $6,000 · InternationalBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Community ImprovementHomestead Valley Community Association: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$335,931Arts & Culture$77,550Other$53,400Human Services$8,000Education$7,500International$6,000Community Improvement$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $330,531 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBERKELEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $8,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Playhouse: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetShotgun Players: $6,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MIME TROUPE INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBerkeley Public Library Foundation: $5,400 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYGROUND: $4,350 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKQED INC: $4,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Lawyers for the Arts: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINEQUALITY MEDIA: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $3,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE: $3,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMILL VALLEY PHILHARMONIC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTheatre Bay Area: $2,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHomestead Valley Community Association: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBerkeley Food Network: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITYSIDE JOURNALISM INITIATIVE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarin Theatre Company: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Z Space Studio: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWRIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKALW PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOETRY FLASH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE C3: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Roxie Theater: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN-AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity of Writers: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRABHORN INSTITUTE: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDisability Rights Advocates: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAGEBRIDGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Playhouse ↗
  • Who funds Shotgun Players ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MIME TROUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley Public Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PLAYGROUND ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds California Lawyers for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds INEQUALITY MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE ↗
  • Who funds MILL VALLEY PHILHARMONIC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Theatre Bay Area ↗
  • Who funds The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY CHAMBER PERFORMANCES ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Homestead Valley Community Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley Food Network ↗
  • Who funds CITYSIDE JOURNALISM INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Marin Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds The Z Space Studio ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA44.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Bernard Osher Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Rhe Charitable Foundation · Fleishhacker Foundation · The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Rock Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · The Whittier Educational Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Leo J & Celia Carlin Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo J & Celia Carlin’s filings →

More from the funding graph