Skip to content
The Leightman Maxey Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Leightman Maxey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$381kFood & Nutrition$216kEducation$149kYouth Development$112kHousing & Shelter$106kCrime & Legal$80kPhilanthropy$68kHealth$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Golden Rule ReEntry$12,500
United Way of Jackson County$12,500
Rogue Valley Farm to School$10,000
Rogue Valley Family YMCA$10,000
Boys and Girls Club of Rogue Valley$4,380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Brookings Community Resource Respon: $3k → 14%Compass House: $15k → 13%Compass House: $15k → 13%Compass House: $15k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $14k → 13%Compass House: $13k → 13%Compass House: $13k → 13%Compass House: $13k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $7k → 13%Rogue Valley Family YMCA: $7k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $22k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $15k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $15k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $13k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $5k → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $250 → 13%Golden Rule ReEntry: $150 → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $20k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $15k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $15k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $15k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $15k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $13k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $12k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $10k → 13%Consumer Credit Counseling Svc of S: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$986k · 18 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +138% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$986k
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+24%

Still filing today

83%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterEmploymentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SOUTHERN OREGON INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +143%
  • KU
    KIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON
    5× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +106%
  • ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -20%
  • KW
    KLAMATH WORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +339%
  • GP
    Grants Pass Josephine Cty Fdn
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rogue Action Center

Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.

Community Improvement
2
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
3
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
4
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
5
Outgrowing Hunger

We nurture connections between people,nature,and food by ensuring access to garden space and farmland, and providing education and mentoring on regenerative and sustainable agricultural practices.

Food & Nutrition
6
Josephine County Farm Collective

The Josephine County Farm Collective connects our community with access to local agricultural products and educational opportunities while strengthening the economic viability of producers.

Food & Nutrition
7
Resource Connections of Oregon

Assisting individuals with developmental disabilities to define, direct and pursue the life they choose through planning and coordination of services and resources.

Health
8
Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education
9
Malheur County Child Development Center

Head start & other children services

Education
10
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
11
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
12
Crossroads Communities

Crossroads communities is an oregon based 501(c) 3 dedicated to empowering and encouraging those suffering from hardship in life by providing them a safe and stable environment to recover from their ailments,offering training in life…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Coast Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Food Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
26/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SOUTHERN OREGON INC: $117,050 · Human ServicesCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVI…COMPASS HOUSE INC: $82,500 · Human ServicesCOMPASS HOUSE INCGOLDEN RULE REENTRY: $69,500 · Human ServicesGOLDEN RULE REENTRYYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA: $57,792 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFO…+2 more: $12,500 · Human ServicesROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL: $87,500 · EducationROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCH…THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $85,174 · EducationTHE FAMILY NURTURING CEN…COLLEGE DREAMS INC: $40,120 · EducationCOLLEGE DREAMS INCTHE VALLEY SCHOOL OF: $25,600 · EducationTHE VALLEY SCHOOL OFKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEG…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationJackson County School District 6: $46,064 · OtherJackson County School Distric…Ashland Family YMCA: $20,000 · OtherAshland Family YMCAGrants Pass Josephine Cty Fdn: $15,000 · OtherACCESS: $15,000 · OtherOSU Klamath Basin Research Ctr: $14,750 · OtherThe Crest at Willow-Witt: $14,200 · OtherMedford School District 549C: $12,487 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: $11,300 · OtherPROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherROGUE RETREAT: $39,943 · OtherROGUE RETREATKLAMATH WORKS INC: $15,000 · OtherOREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME: $12,500 · Other+16 more: $88,339 · Other+16 moreKIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON: $107,500 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS UNLIM…UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $68,196 · PhilanthropyOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND: $57,201 · Housing & ShelterOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $9,577 · Housing & ShelterROGUE FARM CORPS: $43,000 · Environment
Human Services$339,342Education$258,394Other$315,583Youth Development$107,500Philanthropy$68,196Housing & Shelter$66,778Environment$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SOUTHERN OREGON INC: $117,050 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetKIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON: $107,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL: $87,500 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $85,174 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSE INC: $82,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetGOLDEN RULE REENTRY: $69,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $68,196 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA: $57,792 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND: $57,201 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetROGUE FARM CORPS: $43,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCOLLEGE DREAMS INC: $40,120 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetROGUE RETREAT: $39,943 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VALLEY SCHOOL OF: $25,600 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetKLAMATH WORKS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetACCESS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: $11,300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFREEDOM FARMS: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $9,577 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF OREGON: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oregon Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN OREGON ASPIRE: $5,341 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTALENT MAKER CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER APPLEGATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFOUNDATIONS FOR RECOVERY: $4,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBROOKINGS COMMUNITY RESOURCE RESPONSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carpenter Foundat…The Oregon Community …Carrico Family Founda…The Ford Family Found…The Roundhouse Founda…The Collins FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Joe & Frances Naumes …Four Way Community Fo…OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Avista FoundationMeyer Memorial Trust
The Carpenter FoundationOR53.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · Four Way Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leightman Maxey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leightman Maxey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Klamath Works Inc: 96% of income from government
  • Rogue Farm Corps: 91% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Community Action: 85% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon Aspire: 82% of income from government
  • Easter Seals of Oregon: 77% of income from government
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Golden Rule Reentry: 47% of income from government
  • Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time: 42% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery: 38% of income from government
  • Greater Applegate Community Development: 26% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Rogue Valley Farm to School: 17% of income from government
  • Brookings Community Resource Response: 17% of income from government
  • Siskiyou Community Health Center Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat: 12% of income from government
  • United Way of Jackson County Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Compass House Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca: 1% of income from government
  • Josephine County Food Bank: 1% of income from government
  • Klamath Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leightman Maxey’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home