Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lef Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.9MEducation$427kInternational$241kHealth$217kCommunity Improvement$120kEnvironment$111kCivil Rights$83kFood & Nutrition$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $126k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $334k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$4,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIONDOCS$75,000
FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC$50,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC$45,000
POINTS NORTH INSTITUTE$40,000
WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC - AMANDA KOWA$32,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
EXPERIMENTAL SOUND STUDIO - JODIE M$25,000
DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC$25,000
COLOR CONGRESS$25,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY - RICCARDO GIACCON$20,000
MIRABEL PICTURES - BANKER WHITE$15,000
FILM FORUM - LUKE MEYER$15,000
MUSEUM OF CERAMIC ARTSNY$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $3k → 8%THINK NEW MEXICO: $2k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK New Mexico: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%CALISTOGA CARES FOOD BANK INC: $5k → 9%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $2k → 14%CREATIVE CAPITAL: $40k → 17%CAMBRIDGE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE: $5k → 8%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $11k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $11k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $11k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $11k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%Progress Unity Fund: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $9k → 10%Progress Unity Fund: $9k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $5k → 10%PROGRESS UNITY FUND: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Lef Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Lef Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 83 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
109

Total granted

$3.3M
$864k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+16%

Still filing today

70%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $238k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $544k · revenue +331%
  • DE
    DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $283k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CC
    CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • SG
    SHINE GLOBAL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Film Institute

The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…

Arts & Culture
2
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
3
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
4
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
5
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
6
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
7
Center for Arts Design and Social Research Incorporated

The center for arts, design and social research is a private, nonprofit institution of higher education that provides instruction in and conducts research on the relationship of art and design to global societies. the center offers…

Education
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
9
Foundation for Contemporary Arts Inc

To encourage, sponsor, and promote innovative work in the arts created and presented by individuals, groups, and organizations.

Arts & Culture
10
Sundance Institute

Sundance institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the discovery and development of independent artists and audiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
12
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Calistoga Cares Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
39
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/129
Grantees still filing
87/129
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $543,800 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INCDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $320,000 · Arts & CultureDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCUNIONDOCS INC: $190,000 · Arts & CultureUNIONDOCS INCPoints North Institute: $166,500 · Arts & CulturePoints North InstituteTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $73,000 · Arts & Culture+46 more: $771,725 · Arts & Culture+46 moreINTERNATIONAL FILM SEMINARS INC: $60,000 · Other+113 more: $1,310,050 · Other+113 moreCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS: $282,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA C…THE BAY SCHOOL: $75,000 · EducationTHE BAY SCHO…PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AN…RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $22,500 · EducationBosque School: $18,000 · Education+7 more: $34,500 · Education+7 moreProgress Unity Fund: $124,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human Services+4 more: $19,000 · Human ServicesROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $38,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $18,000 · Food & NutritionRIO GRANDE AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $14,000 · Food & NutritionNEW MEXICO LAND CONSERVANCY: $13,000 · Food & NutritionSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,500 · InternationalMercy Corps: $13,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $11,500 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $9,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,500 · PhilanthropyCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $25,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST KYINC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$2,155,025Other$1,370,050Education$472,500Human Services$183,000Food & Nutrition$83,000International$83,000Philanthropy$74,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $543,800 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $320,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS: $282,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIONDOCS INC: $190,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetPoints North Institute: $166,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetProgress Unity Fund: $124,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $90,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BAY SCHOOL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $73,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FILM SEMINARS INC: $60,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetColor Congress: $50,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetWESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCalistoga Art Center Inc: $43,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMETEOR FILMS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTikkun Olam Productions Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS: $36,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDREAMSPRING: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $25,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSHINE GLOBAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBRAIN ARTS ORGANIZATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetRIPPLE OF HOPE FILMSINC DBA NEW FRONTIER FILMS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWALKING IRIS MEDIA: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetExperimental Sound Studio: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER: $19,225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBosque School: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $17,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Futures Collective: $17,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetCONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND: $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN: $15,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBRATTLE FILM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society: $14,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRIO GRANDE AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $14,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS PRODUCTION COALITION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNIONDOCS INC ↗
  • Who funds Points North Institute ↗
  • Who funds Progress Unity Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FILM SEMINARS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Color Congress ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Calistoga Art Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METEOR FILMS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Tikkun Olam Productions Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DREAMSPRING ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHINE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN ARTS ORGANIZATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM27.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Impactassetsinc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lef Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lef Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Vermont Folklife Center: 90% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Upstander Project Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Anikaya Akhra Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Chittenden Community Television: 14% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Neskowin Coast Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Brattle Film Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Coolidge Corner Theatre Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Emerson College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lef Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lef Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 221 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lef’s filings →

More from the funding graph