Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lee and Kay Peterson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$46kInternational$22kYouth Development$8kCommunity Improvement$5kEducation$4kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$281k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STONE CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD$8,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$3,000
WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC$1,500
HERITAGE UNIVERSITY$500
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YAKIMA$500
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$400
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$400
RODS HOUSE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YAKIMA: $1k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YAKIMA: $500 → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YAKIMA: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 17 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$88k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+53%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +134%
  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +12%
  • CE
    CABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • WC
    WESTPARK CHRISTIAN ACADEMY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • BL
    BIBLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
2
Shepherd's House Ministries

To grow disciples of jesus christ by ministering to and serving those in need while sharing god's hope, faith, and love, bringing them to a place of restoration and empowering them to become productive members of our society.

Housing & Shelter
3
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
4
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
5
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
6
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
7
Congregations for the Homeless

Providing shelter, housing, food, and case management services to men experiencing homelessness on the east side of king county, wa.

Housing & Shelter
8
House of Mercy
Human Services
9
The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
10
Union Mission Ministries Inc

Union mission ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to preach the gospel and meet physical and emotional needs through out west virginia through the provision of shelter, clothing, food, counseling, and structured programs for…

Human Services
11
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
12
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Council On Alcoholism; the most unlike its peers is Cabo English Church Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STONE CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $19,000 · OtherSTONE CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODWESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherWESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHYAKIMA CALVARY RESCUE MISSION: $6,000 · OtherYAKIMA CALVARY RESCUE MISSIONWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC: $5,200 · OtherWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAHOMELESS YOUTH WORKGROUP OF YAKIMA COUNTY DBA RODS: $2,650 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES - YAKIMA WA: $2,500 · Other+8 more: $7,950 · Other+8 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $22,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSECABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC: $2,500 · ReligionCABO ENGLISH CHURCH INCYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM: $3,000 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationGenerating Hope Inc: $750 · Housing & ShelterROD'S HOUSE: $450 · Housing & Shelter
Other$63,300Religion$24,500Health$3,000Human Services$2,000Education$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellness House: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROD'S HOUSE: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM ↗
  • Who funds CABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Generating Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds ROD'S HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association · Yakima Rotary Charities · Bacon Legacy Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lee and Kay Peterson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lee and Kay Peterson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lee and Kay Peterson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph