· Public charity
Yakima Rotary Charities
To provide grants to fund rotary projects within the community and to other organizations that are designated as a 501(c)3 organization by the internal revenue service.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $61,328 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $199,445 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $138,117 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP | $22,396 |
| OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA | $19,723 |
| YAKIMA ROTARY FOOD BANK | $6,403 |
| ST VINCENT CENTER FOOD BANK | $6,403 |
| SELAH FOOD BANK | $6,403 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +4%
- RHROD'S HOUSE2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +139%
- OIOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON6× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- COCHILDREN OF THE NATIONSone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +7%
- TRTHE ROTARY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $11k
- CBCanyon Blooms Petals For Patientsone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
YWCA Bellingham is part of a national network of programs with the shared mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, and freedom for all.
Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…
We are actively replacing systems of oppression with ecosystems of care and safety for all our communities through Black and Brown organizing, prioritizing land and bodily autonomy, and reclaiming our cultural narratives.
The mission of the YMCA of the Inland Northwest is to put Christian Principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The YMCA of the Inland Northwest is a diverse organization of men, women and…
The mission of Love in The Name of Christ of Yakima is to empower families to break out of poverty and live in spiritual, personal, and financial freedom by linking them with trained volunteers from a network of 26+ local churches.We…
To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.
The drc of yakima and kittitas counties is part of an association of 21 drc's inwa state. we provide services and training for people to resolve disputes peacefully with a goal of building strong, compassionate and peaceful families,…
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
Elevate's mission is to promote safety, competence, and confidence as youth create their path through adolescence and into adulthood.elevate provides a wide range of innovative and effective programs that empower and enrich the lives of…
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
To improve the quality of life in our communities by providing accessible and integrated health and social services, ending homelessness, and offering unique learning opportunities for students of health professions.
Youthcare works to end youth homelessness and to ensure that young people are valued for who they are and empowered to achieve their potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Artfarm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ROD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Yakima Rotary Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds Canyon Blooms Petals For Patients ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM O DOUGLAS TRAIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Selah-Naches Food Bank ↗
- Who funds PRIME TIME ↗
- Who funds THE YAKIMA YOUTH GOLF ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds ARTFARM ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE SCHOLAR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · The Lee and Kay Peterson Family Foundation Inc · Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Casey Family Programs · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yakima Rotary Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.