Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ledy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$82kRecreation & Sports$69kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$10kAnimals$7kArts & Culture$5kHousing & Shelter$4kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TROUT LAKE CAMP$59,835
THE NEST RETREAT CENTER$12,400
LIVIN FOUNDATION$5,080
AMPLIFY$5,000
COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES$4,200
HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION$4,000
HARRISON'S PLAYMAKERS$4,000
MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,100
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EVERY MEAL$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
JUAB FOOD SHELF$2,000
WHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF$1,100
GULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 4 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$87k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-2%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NEST RETREAT CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $71k
  • TH
    THE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +18%
  • EM
    EVERY MEAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMPASSION CONNECTION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • CD
    CAN DO CANINES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • HC
    HOPE CHEST
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Minnesota

Through education, support, and advocacy, nami minnesota champions justice, dignity, and respect for all individuals and families affected by mental illnesses. to serve that mission, nami minnesota works with individuals with mental…

—
2
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
3
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
4
Minnesota Community Health Worker Alliance

The minnesota community health worker alliance builds community and systems capacity for better health through the integration of community health worker (chw) strategies. our vision is equitable and optimal outcomes for all communities.…

Health
5
Special Olympics Minnesota Inc

Special olympics minnesota's mission is to create a new world of inclusion and acceptance for people with intellectual disabilities. we do this by providing year-round sports training and athletic competitions, inclusive healthcare…

—
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Mental Health America in Allen County Inc

Dedicated to providing essential informaiton, resources, advocacy and education to help individuals and families better gain access to the prevention, treatment and recovery programs needed to be successful.

Education
8
Advocating Change Together

Advocating change together's (act) mission is to advance "self advocacy" which, as its name suggests, engages people with developmental disabilities to be in charge of their own decisions and to speak for themselves. act describes…

Human Services
9
Goodlife Innovations Inc

Goodlife's mission is to make a meaningful difference in the everyday lives of individuals who need help to live more independently (individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, brain injuries, physical or age-related…

Human Services
10
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
11
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
12
Mental Health Resources Inc

The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livin Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wellness in the Woods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEST RETREAT CENTER: $70,500 · OtherNEST RETREAT CENTERTROUT LAKE CAMP: $59,835 · OtherTROUT LAKE CAMPCOMPASSION CONNECTION: $6,400 · Other+17 more: $32,939 · Other+17 moreTHE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC: $8,800 · Recreation & SportsMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $4,600 · HealthJACK'S BASKET: $2,900 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthEVERY MEAL: $4,400 · Food & NutritionWHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,100 · Food & NutritionLIVIN FOUNDATION: $5,080 · Human ServicesHARRISONS PLAYMAKERS: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentGULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION: $2,800 · Environment
Other$169,674Recreation & Sports$8,800Health$7,600Food & Nutrition$5,500Human Services$5,080Youth Development$4,000Environment$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC: $8,800 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLIVIN FOUNDATION: $5,080 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $4,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRISONS PLAYMAKERS: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJACK'S BASKET: $2,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION: $2,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNDS VIEW SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellness in the Woods Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds HARRISONS PLAYMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds JACK'S BASKET ↗
  • Who funds GULL CHAIN OF LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds Wellness in the Woods Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ledy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ledy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ledy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph