· Public charity
The Least of These Ministries Inc
The Organization seeks to help churches, non-profits, and individuals fulfill their God given missions to thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $370,043 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $409,480 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,437 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cystic Fibrosis Foundation | $61,300 |
| Impact Clay Inc | $37,500 |
| Jacksonville Semper Fidelis Society Inc | $30,650 |
| World Help Inc | $30,000 |
| Breakthrough T1D Inc | $27,650 |
| Mercy Support Services | $25,000 |
| Onechild Global Inc | $23,856 |
| Tim Tebow Foundation | $20,000 |
| Samaritans Purse Inc | $20,000 |
| Wycliffe Bible Translators Inc | $15,000 |
| Honey Lake Clinic Inc | $10,295 |
| Free Burma Rangers | $10,000 |
| Rise Church Inc | $10,000 |
| Open Doors International Inc | $10,000 |
| A21 USA Inc | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 75% of The Least of These Ministries Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 11% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $108k · revenue +22%
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1D3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +35%
- OGONECHILD GLOBAL2× · 2024–2025 · $59k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- SRSEAMARK RANCH INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -35%
- CHCABARET HAITI MISSION INCone grant, 2024 · $30k
- DMDugit Messianic Outreach Centerone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.
Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.
Our mission is to counter human trafficking and provide holistic restoration: at home and around the world.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Religious
Mercy Projects is a Christian 501c3 organization with a "Christ-centered, family-focused" vision of assisting vulnerable children and families. We work primarily in Ukraine, Armenia, and Kosovo.
Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.
i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Honey Lake Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Open Doors International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEAMARK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds IMPACT CLAY INC ↗
- Who funds World Help ↗
- Who funds Dugit Messianic Outreach Center ↗
- Who funds ARIZE TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds Connect Us 4 Life Inc ↗
- Who funds Mercy Support Sevices Inc ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTING HIM INC ↗
- Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds HONEY LAKE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE ENTERPRISES OF NORTH FL INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds A21 USA INC ↗
- Who funds BARNABAS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BRILLIANCE LABS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Least of These Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Challenge Enterprises of North Fl Inc — 28% of income from government
- Honey Lake Clinic Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mercy Support Sevices Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.