· Private foundation
The Lawrence H Hyde Jr Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $190k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MARK'S HIGH SCHOOL | $300,000 |
| CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL | $150,000 |
| CRS (CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES) | $100,000 |
| DIOCESE OF BROWNSVILLE | $50,000 |
| SALESIAN MISSIONS | $46,990 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| THE CATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| FRANCISCAN MISSIONARY SISTERS FOR AFRICA | $15,000 |
| JESUITS NEW YORK PROVIDENCE | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| PIME MISSIONARIES | $10,000 |
| JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA | $10,000 |
| SPIRITAN OFFICE OF MISSION ADVANCEMENTSPIRITANS USA | $5,000 |
| SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE6× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +216%
- UCUkrainian Catholic University Foundation5× · 2019–2024 · $79k · revenue +101%
- SRSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- MMMONTFORT MISSIONARIES USAone grant, 2018 · $40k
- UCUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $28k
- HHHope House Ministries Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +120%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empower surivors through educational opportunities, mental health counseling, and micro-loans to create jobs and build a brighter future.
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
The purpose of the international dominican foundation is to aid and support the national and international projects of the dominican order of the catholic church.
The program provides scholarships and guidance for drcongo youth to attend universities to complete degrees of their gifting that prepare them to join church led community development in drcongo.
To prepare emerging leaders to initiate,develop and sustain christian-based youth development organizations and to seed their new ministries as they serve vulnerable children and teens in our world's most under-resourced communities.
The United Religions Initiative Foundation, inc. Was created by united religions dba united religions initiative's ("URI's ") global council with its sole purpose to stand as an independent, trustworthy vehicle for the oversight and…
To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…
Propagation of the Christian Religion
Increase awareness of and raise support in the u.s. for uganda christian university.
Aids marginalized children of Uganda by providing education, community development, and Christian discipleship. Focused on building and helping to support Kamwenge Secondary and Vocational School and Good Shepherd Kindergarten and Primary…
UGS assists bright Ukrainian high school students from modest backgrounds in getting a world-class education abroad, in exchange for their commitment to returning to Ukraine and working there for at least five years. UGS aims to develop a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sudan Relief Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope House Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Hope House Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds BUILDING A BRIDGE TO UGANDA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RWANDAN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH RENEWAL FUND ↗
- Who funds SUDAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lawrence H Hyde Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lawrence H Hyde Jr Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Lawrence H Hyde Jr Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.