Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Laboiteaux - Sharp Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$555k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$1.8MArts & Culture$705kHuman Services$133kPublic Benefit$75kAnimals$30kHousing & Shelter$25kPhilanthropy$21kHealth$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $185k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISS PORTERS'S SCHOOL$300,000
THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL$185,000
LYMAN ALLYN ART MUSEUM$20,000
LYME ACADAMY OF FINE ARTS$10,000
THE DIPLOMAT RECEPTION ROOMS$10,000
PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM$10,000
ISLESBORO COMMUNITY FUND$10,000
WINDERMERE ISLAND FOUNDATION INC$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH DARK HARBOR$2,500
ISLESBRO ISLANDS TRUST$1,000
LIFEFLIGHT FOUNDATION$500
MACCURDY SALISBURY EDUCATIONAL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $15k → 13%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $15k → 13%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $13k → 13%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $10k → 13%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $10k → 13%PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
MO
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 23 repeat orgs$723k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$710k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+32%

Still filing today

78%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +47%
  • TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $550k · revenue +17%
  • PR
    PRIPET RIDING PROGRAM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $73k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • HU
    HARRIET U ALLYN TESTAMENTARY TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +54%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $53k
  • UD
    US DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
2
Aquidneck Island Land Trust

To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.

Environment
3
Florence Griswold Museum Inc

The florence griswold museum seeks to promote a greater understanding of connecticut's contribution to american art and history through public exhibitions and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
4
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
5
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
6
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
7
The Landmark Society of Western New York Inc

To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…

Arts & Culture
8
Coastal Mountains Land Trust

We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.

Environment
9
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
10
Isles Community Foundation Inc

The foundation acts as a supporting organization for isles, inc. as described in section 509 (a)(3) of the internal revenue code. the foundation manages the investment activites of isles, inc.

Philanthropy
11
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
12
Preserve Rhode Island

Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seven Hills School and the most unlike its peers is Pripet Riding Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsLand Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr20%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr18%5%20–35yr14%9%35–55yr20%85%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,417

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
23/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $1,085,000 · EducationMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INCTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $550,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOLTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $60,000 · Education+4 more — $86,000 · EducationHARRIET U ALLYN TESTAMENTARY TRUST — $500,000 · Arts & CultureHARRIET U ALLYN TESTA…LYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS — $22,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $12,500 · Arts & CultureLYMAN ALLYN ART MUSEUM INC — $125,000 · OtherLYMAN ALLYN ART MU…Individual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…THE DIPLOMAT RECEPTION ROOMS — $60,000 · OtherTHE DIPLOMAT RECEP…Individual grant recipient — $53,100 · OtherIndividual grant r…US DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherUS DEPARTMENT OF S…TOWN OF ISLESBORO — $25,000 · Other+14 more — $97,505 · Other+14 morePRIPET RIDING PROGRAM — $72,850 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI ZOO FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · AnimalsIslesboro Affordable Property — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WINDERMERE ISLAND FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · PhilanthropyIslesboro Islands Trust — $6,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,781,000Arts & Culture$554,500Other$470,605Human Services$72,850Animals$30,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Philanthropy$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $1,085,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $550,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHARRIET U ALLYN TESTAMENTARY TRUST — $500,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetPRIPET RIDING PROGRAM — $72,850 over 6y, 19% of budgetTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL — $51,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI ZOO FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF STOWE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetIslesboro Affordable Property — $25,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS — $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WINDERMERE ISLAND FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetISLESBORO COMMUNITY FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCincinnati Parks Foundation — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMacCurdy Salisbury Educational Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetIslesboro Islands Trust — $6,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLYME LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLifeFlight Foundation — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLYME AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD LYME FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clarence & Anne Dillon Dunwalke TrustNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clarence & Anne Dillon Dunwalke Trust · Windhover Foundation · The Newcomb-Hargraves Foundation · Palace Head Foundation Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Laboiteaux - Sharp Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Lyme Land Conservation Trust Inc16% of income from government
  • Harriet U Allyn Testamentary Trust9% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Laboiteaux - Sharp Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Laboiteaux - Sharp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph