Skip to content

· Private foundation

The L and R Donner Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$700
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$99kEducation$46kHuman Services$41kAnimals$41kArts & Culture$40kEnvironment$33kCivil Rights$12kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
1
States reached
$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF USA$700
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$700
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $5k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $9k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $916 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $750 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $500 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $250 → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $250 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $250 → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $200 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $150 → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 53 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 51 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
74

Total granted

$259k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+37%

Still filing today

47%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN
    4× · 2018–2022 · $30k · revenue +15%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +63%
  • TI
    TREEPEOPLE INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • M
    MPTF
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • NL
    NRDC LA LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • UF
    UW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
Los Angeles Police Foundation

The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)

Human Services
7
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
10
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

—
11
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
12
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
35/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MPTF: $20,000 · OtherMPTFUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONNRDC LA LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherUW FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherOPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10,000 · OtherWOMEN'S GUILD CEDARS-SINAI: $9,600 · OtherORCAS ISLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL: $9,500 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY: $9,350 · OtherTHE FUNHOUSE COMMONS: $9,000 · Other+86 more: $164,226 · Other+86 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $17,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI …ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $11,500 · HealthALZHEIMERS GR…LUPUS LA CO EMERGE: $10,150 · HealthLUPUS LA CO E…AWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $5,000 · HealthAWAKENING REC…+4 more: $3,500 · Health+4 moreUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $30,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIE…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,916 · Human ServicesCANINE COMP…International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $4,750 · Human ServicesInternation…+4 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesTREEPEOPLE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentWildlife Health Center Foundation: $2,500 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $1,700 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,200 · Environment+2 more: $750 · EnvironmentUCLA FOUNDATION: $13,200 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,550 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,875 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $1,775 · AnimalsLINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION: $1,500 · AnimalsWESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES: $1,250 · AnimalsWILDAID INC: $1,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $700 · Animals+1 more: $200 · AnimalsUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,950 · International+1 more: $150 · International
Other$267,676Health$47,150Human Services$41,866Environment$21,150Education$13,400Animals$10,850International$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $13,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $11,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUPUS LA CO EMERGE: $10,150 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,916 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Health Center Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE FARRAH FAWCETT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $1,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDAID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER STREET WEST ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN MENDING HEARTS INC: $850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWALLACE RHEUMATIC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN IN FILM: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHSA COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKESPEARE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIAS HOPE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GHETTO FILM SCHOOL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS LA CO EMERGE ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AWAKENING RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Health Center Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · The Carole Bayer Sager and Bob Daly Foundation · The Katie McGrath & Jj Abrams Family Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The L and R Donner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The L and R Donner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The L and R Donner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The L and R Donner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L and R Donner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph