Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kusinski Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$182kHuman Services$37kHealth$27kYouth Development$8kCommunity Improvement$7kRecreation & Sports$5kAnimals$5kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$515
Median grant
5
States reached
$553k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLNWAY WEST$5,530
BARRET BEAR CALLAGHAN WIN IT FOUNDA$5,500
ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$4,150
FC America Youth Club$1,589
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Together We Cope$1,000
SALUTE INC$515
US Hockey Foundation$515
Four Winds Nature Institute$500
Leukemia Lymphoma Society$500
VT Land Trust$500
ROANOKE PARK COUNSELING$500
CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITY$414
Plainfield Central High School$314
Joliet Catholic Academy$208
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%south eastern guide dogs: $1k → 10%TOGETHER WE COPE: $6k → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $5k → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $3k → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $2k → 14%Together We Cope: $1k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $6k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $2k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $2k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$245k · 20 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
32

Total granted

$245k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TOGETHER WE COPE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +5%
  • IF
    Invest for Kids Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +39%
  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • AR
    ANN ROBERT H LURI CHILDRENS HOSPITA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NV
    NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +193%
  • SS
    SPL SPORTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
5
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Rush Copley Medical Center

To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
9
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
10
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Financial Journalism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $163,259 · OtherST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL+42 more: $33,665 · Other+42 moreTOGETHER WE COPE: $15,500 · Human ServicesTOGETHER WE …Invest for Kids Inc: $12,592 · Human ServicesInvest for K…SALUTE INC: $1,288 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesBARRETT BEAR CALLAGHAN WIN IT FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Education+2 more: $625 · EducationHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $4,800 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,500 · HealthRoanoke Park Counseling: $2,250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,465 · HealthBRAINUP INC: $1,250 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $750 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthNMDP FOUNDATION: $8,500 · PhilanthropyChicago Run: $4,600 · PhilanthropyANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $3,500 · Animals+1 more: $100 · AnimalsSPL SPORTS INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $600 · Recreation & Sports
Other$196,924Human Services$30,380Education$18,125Health$15,115Philanthropy$13,600Animals$3,600Recreation & Sports$3,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARRETT BEAR CALLAGHAN WIN IT FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetTOGETHER WE COPE: $15,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInvest for Kids Inc: $12,592 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $4,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Run: $4,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPL SPORTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRoanoke Park Counseling: $2,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTwin Cities Lyme Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,465 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSALUTE INC: $1,288 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAINUP INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $521 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSA HOCKEY FOUNDATION: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR WINDS NATURE INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL JOURNALISM: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCulinary Care: $256 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKFORT SCHOOL DISTRICT 157-C FOUNDATION: $104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARRETT BEAR CALLAGHAN WIN IT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE COPE ↗
  • Who funds Invest for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Run ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds SPL SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Roanoke Park Counseling ↗
  • Who funds Twin Cities Lyme Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SALUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAINUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds USA HOCKEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUR WINDS NATURE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL JOURNALISM ↗
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kusinski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kusinski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kusinski Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph