· Private foundation
The Kroon Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RED BANK REGIONAL SOURCE | $53,000 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $20,000 |
| SHORE CLUBHOUSE | $20,000 |
| SISTERS ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER | $15,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $15,000 |
| TWO RIVER THEATRE | $10,000 |
| MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $10,000 |
| HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| TRINITY HALL | $10,000 |
| RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL FUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NEW JERSEY SEEDS | $7,500 |
| MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDTION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSHORE CLUBHOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +219%
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +202%- PFParker Family Health Center Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +164%
Funded once
- YUYALE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Muhlenberg regional medical center is committed to excellence in
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverview Hospital Foundation Inc D/B/a Riverview Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Richard Hampton Jenrette Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHORE CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Parker Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY SEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
- Who funds Resources for the Future Inc ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER MONMOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC D/B/A RIVERVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds RICHARD HAMPTON JENRETTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Trinity Hall ↗
- Who funds PHELPS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Monmouth County Historical Association ↗
- Who funds HOLIDAY EXPRESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation · Mary Owen Borden Memorial Fund · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Jam Anonymous Foundation Inc · The Ansell Grimm & Aaron Foundation Inc · The Jay and Linda Grunin Foundation D/B/A Grunin Foundation · The Gravina Family Foundation Inc · The Stone Foundation of New Jersey · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kroon Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family and Children's Services Inc — 78% of income from government
- Asbury Park Music Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shore Clubhouse Inc — 7% of income from government
- Monmouth Day Care Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Squash Haven Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jespy House Inc — 2% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.