Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Krone Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$449k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$415kFood & Nutrition$45kArts & Culture$45kScience & Tech$25kEducation$25kHousing & Shelter$20kInternational$20kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOUTING AMERICA FOUNDATION$333,333
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$25,000
MONTREAT CONFERENCE CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON$10,000
RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY$10,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$5,000
START THE ADVENTURE IN READING ANNAPOLIS$5,000
LIGHT HOUSE$5,000
DC SCORES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $5k → 8%Scouting America Silicon Valley Monterey Bay Counc: $1k → 8%Los Angeles Regional Food Bank: $5k → 14%Prospect Park Alliance: $5k → 20%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $10k → 10%SCOUTING AMERICA FOUNDATION: $333k → 14%RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $10k → 14%MONTREAT CONFERENCE CENTER: $20k → 12%JOHNSON C SMITH THEOLOGICAL: $10k → 13%WETA LEADERSHIP CIRCLE: $11k → 7%The Light House: $5k → 6%Harvard Business School: $5k → 8%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%Mountain Retreat Association: $10k → 12%WETA: $10k → 7%The Light House: $5k → 6%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%Mountain Retreat Association: $10k → 12%Start the Adventure in Reading Annapolis Inc: $5k → 6%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%START THE ADVENTURE IN READING ANNAPOLIS: $5k → 6%CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $10k → 14%The Light House: $5k → 6%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $25k → 14%LIGHT HOUSE: $5k → 6%Smithsonian Institution (Natl Air & Space Museum): $25k → 14%DC Scores: $5k → 14%DC SCORES: $5k → 14%DC Scores: $5k → 14%DC Scores: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 7 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$180k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+44%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $394k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue -3%
  • DS
    DC SCORES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • TC
    Transatlantic Council Boy Scouts of America
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

—
2
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
3
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
7
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
8
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
9
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
10
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
11
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
12
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Regional Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCOUTING AMERICA FOUNDATION: $333,333 · OtherSCOUTING AMERICA FOUNDATIONDC SCORES: $20,000 · OtherMONTREAT CONFERENCE CENTER: $20,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN RETREAT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Other+11 more: $82,400 · Other+11 moreSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIA…GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WA…NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHAITI REFORESTATION PARTNERSHIP: $20,000 · InternationalRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · Environment
Other$475,733Arts & Culture$60,000Youth Development$50,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Housing & Shelter$20,000International$20,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDC SCORES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAITI REFORESTATION PARTNERSHIP: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DC SCORES ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITI REFORESTATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Krone Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Krone Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Krone Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Krone Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krone’s filings →

More from the funding graph