Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Krieble Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$526k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$2.4MHealth$1.8MEducation$1.8MPublic Benefit$1.3MSocial Science$720kScience & Tech$575kCommunity Improvement$205kPhilanthropy$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $441k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTREAL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$200,000
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$93,359
LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES$75,000
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$72,667
CAMP WEREDALE FOUNDATION$20,000
GREENE CENTER$15,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS CANADA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE$10,000
PRIORY SCHOOL$10,000
VERITAS FUND$5,000
THE STUDY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 54% of grant dollars ($5.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 46% that went abroad ($4.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AYN RAND INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS: $1.0M → 12%ATLAS NETWORK: $125k → 14%MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $25k → 9%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $100k → 12%FRIENDS FOR THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER: $210k → 5%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 7%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $85k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS: $1.0M → 12%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $100k → 12%FRIENDS FOR THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER: $80k → 5%CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY FOUNDATION: $75k → 6%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 7%DONARS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER): $80k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS: $200k → 12%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $25k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $100k → 12%FRIENDS FOR THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER: $80k → 5%CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY: $25k → 6%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 7%DONOR TRUST INC: $80k → 9%AYN RAND INSTITUTE: $20k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUM: $40k → 12%AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $100k → 12%CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES - EUROPE: $50k → 7%DONORS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER IMRS): $60k → 9%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $15k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $75k → 12%CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY: $25k → 6%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 7%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $60k → 9%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $75k → 12%CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%ATLAS NETWORK: $75k → 7%DONORS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER IMRS): $60k → 9%NATIONAL TAXPAYER UNION FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $75k → 12%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%NATIONAL TAXPAYER UNION FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES: $50k → 12%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%NATIONAL TAXPAYER UNION FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%DONORS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER ERB): $20k → 9%NATIONAL TAXPAYER UNION FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%DONORS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER ERB): $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
VA
NM
DC

Beyond the US: 46% of all-years giving ($4.3M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$3.0M · 52 grants
Turks and Caicos$1.3M · 13 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 27 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
12

Total granted

$8.9M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+49%

Still filing today

22%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    Leadership Program of the Rockies
    8× · 2017–2025 · $675k · revenue +61%
  • NT
    NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +24%
  • TA
    THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM
    5× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • DT
    DONARS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER)
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES- EUROPE
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · 58% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -84% · 54% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
2
The Libertarian Institute

Disseminate information and education about pertinent economic, social and governmental topics, via print, web and other media to educate the public about the principles of LIbertarianism.

Education
3
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
6
Institute for New Global Politics Inc

The Institute for New Global Politics is a California-based educational nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. It is an independent and nonpartisan thinktank dedicated to educating the general…

International
7
Technology Policy Institute
International
8
The Berkeley Policy Institute Inc
Social Science
9
The Future of Freedom Foundation

Economic education

Civil Rights
10
Us - China Policy Foundation
—
11
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
12
Yorktown Institute

Yorktown Institute's primary exempt purpose is to conduct research into matters of foreign policy relevant to the United States and present its findings to the public and relevant stakeholders.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tax Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Leadership Program of the Rockies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS: $2,200,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOSTCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,199,857 · OtherTCI EDUCATION FOUNDATIONMONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,006,000 · OtherMONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMONTREAL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $809,000 · OtherMONTREAL CHILDRENS HOSPITALATLAS NETWORK: $575,000 · OtherATLAS NETWORKPRIORY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $410,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER: $370,000 · Other+25 more: $1,672,000 · Other+25 moreLeadership Program of the Rockies: $675,000 · Public BenefitLeadership…Center For Freedom and Prosperity Foundation: $125,000 · Public BenefitCenter For…Center For Freedom and Prosperity: $50,000 · Public BenefitCenter For…+2 more: $35,000 · Public BenefitDonors Trust Inc: $130,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM: $60,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUM INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$8,241,857Public Benefit$885,000Philanthropy$130,000Arts & Culture$100,000Youth Development$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLeadership Program of the Rockies: $675,000 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER: $370,000 over 3y, 56% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetDonors Trust Inc: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter For Freedom and Prosperity Foundation: $125,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM: $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES- EUROPE: $50,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetCenter For Freedom and Prosperity: $50,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetTholos Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Leadership Program of the Rockies ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center For Freedom and Prosperity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES- EUROPE ↗
  • Who funds Center For Freedom and Prosperity ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Tholos Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Krieble Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Krieble Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Krieble’s filings →

    More from the funding graph