How much did THE KRIEBLE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of THE KRIEBLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

studieseconomic

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

montreal childrensdonors austrianaustrian ecoeconomic

2023

taxpayer uniondonors austrianaustrian eco

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $11k
$10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$20M

Total assets

Largest grants

MONTREAL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$200,000
FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS$200,000
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$170,747
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$136,000
DONARS TRUST (AUSTRIAN ECO CENTER)$80,000
LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES$75,000
MONTREAL ECONOMIC CENTER$75,000
ATLAS NETWORK$75,000
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$50,000
NATIONAL TAXPAYER UNION FOUNDATION$50,000
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$40,000
CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY$25,000
GREENE CENTER$15,000
AYN RAND INSTITUTE$10,000
PRIORY SCHOOL$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 7%. 75% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.5M · 28 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.5M

$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+95%

Still filing today

14%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Public BenefitYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FO
FRIENDS OF THE TURKS AND CAICOS
2× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M
TE
TCI EDUCATION FOUNDATION
6× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M
MC
MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2021 · $1.0M

Funded once

DT
DONOR TRUST INC
one grant, 2021 · $80k
IF
INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES - EUROPE
one grant, 2018 · $50k · 58% of their budget
FO
FRIENDS OF THE TURKS & CAICOS NATIONAL MUSEUMgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +342% · 54% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Us - China Policy Foundation

—

Washington Federal Foundation

Philanthropy

Charles Koch Foundation

Education

Lawfare Institute

Produce scientific content on lawfare and the analysis of emblematic cases of the phenomenon through publication of the lawfare website, podcasts and related media.

Public Benefit

Technology Policy Institute

International

Third Federal Foundation

Philanthropy

Contemporary Policy Institute

Philanthropy

Foundation for Economic Education Inc

To promote and educate in the principles of sound economics

Social Science

The George W Bush Foundation

The following are the purposes for which the corporation is organized as set forth in the certificate of formation: (i) to endow a presidential archival depository, as defined by section 2101(1) of title 44 of the united states code…

Education

Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International

Institute for State Policy Leaders

The institute for state policy leaders was created to assist state policymakers in making informed policy decisions by conducting nonpartisan educational programming.continued on sch o

Social Science

Charles Koch Institute

Inspired by a recognition that free people are capable of extraordinary things, stand together fellowships supports educational programs and dialogue to advance these principles, challenge convention, and eliminate barriers that stifle…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tholos Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Leadership Program of the Rockies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/9

Grantees still filing

6/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,010,831Public Benefit$785,000Arts & Culture$40,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE KRIEBLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES - EUROPE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up +95% since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 541517996 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES - EUROPE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Krieble Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Krieble Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE KRIEBLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Krieble Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE KRIEBLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Krieble Foundation?

More from the funding graph