How much did THE KRAUSSBASCHAB FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE KRAUSSBASCHAB FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

congregationresearchtampa

2021

congregationbowlingtampa

2022

direct supportdirectbowlingtampa bay

2023

abuse

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k31 grants · $48k
$10k–50k1 grant · $31k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

ROTARY CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA FOUNDATION$31,200
GULF COAST USBC$8,865
FRIENDS OF FLORIDA STATE FORESTS INC$5,000
FUTURE CHURCH$5,000
INTERNATIONAL BOWLING MUSEUM & HALL OF FAME$2,500
MORNING STAR SCHOOL$2,500
ST JUDE CATHEDRAL SCHOOL$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ST PETE$2,000
BAUDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,000
ST PETERSBURG AQUATICS$2,000
ST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,500
DAN DICCIO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
LEALMAN & ASIAN NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY CENTER$1,000
ST VINCENT'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$268k · 41 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$268k

$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+15%

Still filing today

34%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsCrime & LegalHealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
ROTARY CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA FOUNDATION
2× · 2022–2023 · $52k · revenue +148% · 41% of their budget
TO
TAMPA ORLANDO PINELLAS JEWISH FOUNDATION
2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +83%
SP
ST PETERSBURG AQUATICS
4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +68%

Funded once

MI
MADE IN BROWARD
one grant, 2022 · $5k
PINELLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +10%
CC
CAMP CORAL
one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Florida Aquarium Inc

The Florida Aquarium's shared purpose is a commitment to saving marine wildlife. Our Vision is to be Florida's leading conservation- based aquarium.

Animals

Florida Animal Protection Foundation

Animals

Keep Tampa Bay Beautiful

We foster personal inspiration through environmental motivation.

Environment

Florida State Parks Foundation Inc

Florida state parks foundation preserves, protects, sustains and grows florida state parks.

Recreation & Sports

Naples Zoo Inc

To inspire people of all ages to respect, value and help conserve wildlife and our natural world.

Animals

Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

Committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—

Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc

To serve the tampa bay area by bidding on and hosting premier sports and entertainment events.

Recreation & Sports

South Florida Wildlife Center Inc

The south florida wildlife centers mission is protecting wildlife through rescue, rehabilitation, release, and education. the sfwc has been the trusted resource for wildlife in the tri-county region of miami-dade, broward, and palm beach,…

Animals

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Transform the lives of animals through passionate collaboration with our community.

Animals

Florida Wildlife Federation

To conserve Florida's wildlife, habitat, and natural resources through education, advocacy and science-based stewardship.

Animals

The Florida Recreation & Park

The mission of the florida recreation and park association is to establish park and recreation as a cornerstone of health, economic, development, environmental sustainability, and community throughout the state of florida.

—

National Kidney Foundation of Florida

The mission of the national kidney foundation of florida is to prevent kidney and urinary tract diseases, improve the health and well-being of patients and families affected by these diseases and increase the availability of all organs for…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is FreeFall Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/31

the rest of the field

14%

4,814/35,365

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/26

Grantees still filing

19/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$197,924Philanthropy$66,200Recreation & Sports$18,865Crime & Legal$7,000Education$6,000Animals$4,950Health$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Milkey Family Foundation Inc · Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Dwayne Hawkins Family Foundation Inc · White Family Foundation · Socius Foundation · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE KRAUSSBASCHAB FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROTARY CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~1187 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270201862 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROTARY CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 1187 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Kraussbaschab Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Kraussbaschab Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE KRAUSSBASCHAB FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Kraussbaschab Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE KRAUSSBASCHAB FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Kraussbaschab Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph