Skip to content
The Krasne Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Krasne Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.4MEducation$1.3MReligion$180kPhilanthropy$94kSocial Science$50kRecreation & Sports$10kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION$35,000
BET AM SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$10,000
THE USMMA SAILING FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL FUND: $25k → 16%MONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 7%HARVEY SCHOOL: $150k → 9%MONTEFIORE NYACK FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $35k → 20%STAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $300k → 11%YALE ALUMNI FUND: $40k → 12%THE USMMA SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%UNITED WAY: $3k → 9%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL FUND: $25k → 16%HARVEY SCHOOL: $150k → 9%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $200k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $35k → 20%HARVEY SCHOOL: $150k → 9%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $100k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $35k → 20%HARVEY SCHOOL: $50k → 9%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $35k → 20%HARVEY SCHOOL: $50k → 9%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $30k → 20%HARVEY SCHOOL: $50k → 9%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $30k → 20%HARVEY SCHOOL: $50k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $35k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $30k → 20%BET AM SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $10k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION: $35k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $30k → 20%UNITED WAY: $3k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $35k → 17%NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $28k → 20%UNITED WAY: $3k → 9%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $15k → 17%STEPHEN WISE FREE SYNAGOGUE: $100k → 17%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $850k → 17%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $300k → 17%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $200k → 17%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $100k → 17%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $50k → 17%MEMORAL SLOAN KETTERING: $200k → 17%CARINGKIND: $20k → 17%CARINGKIND: $20k → 17%CARINGKIND: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 11 repeat orgs$923k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$3.4M
$903k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+11%

Still filing today

45%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HARVEY SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $650k · revenue +46%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $288k · revenue +36%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • MN
    Montefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $1,500,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGENYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $655,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $288,000 · OtherNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATESIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more: $436,500 · Other+9 moreTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $650,000 · EducationTHE HARVEY SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $300,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD+1 more: $10,000 · EducationMontefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $60,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthTHE MONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropySIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,079,500Education$960,000Health$165,000Philanthropy$85,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $650,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $288,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMontefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HARVEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES ↗
  • Who funds Montefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE USMMA SAILING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Krasne Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Krasne Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krasne’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home