Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Kissler Family Foundation

To provide funds for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.

$1.4M
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of The Kissler Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Idaho Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Kissler Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $326k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
17
13
18
10
19
13
20
13
21
11
22
10
23
10
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$14MHealth$1.0MEducation$319kHuman Services$201kEnvironment$81kArts & Culture$65kYouth Development$41kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $325,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,430,630 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,105,130 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
IDAHO ELKS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL$42,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY FOUNDATION$25,000
ST LUKE'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$23,400
ST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION$15,600
IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN$15,000
ZOO BOISE$15,000
WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$15,000
WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$11,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$10,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$7,500
CANYON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,500
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $15k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $24k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $20k → 8%WARHAWK AIR MUSEUM: $13k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $11k → 8%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $7k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $8k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $8k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $6k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $6k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2017, 5 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$1.5M
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+23%

Still filing today

87%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd
    8× · 2017–2024 · $261k · revenue +67%
  • IE
    IDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $174k · revenue +69%
  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $174k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • BP
    BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +94%
  • TV
    TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -24%
  • AW
    AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Alphonsus Health System Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.saint alphonsus health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
2
St Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
5
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

6
Bozeman Deaconess Foundation

To support Bozeman Health Services by promoting community participation in and financial support of activities to improve community health and quality of life.

Philanthropy
7
St Luke's McCall Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Teton Valley Health Care

To encourage and support a healthier community.

Health
9
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…

Health
12
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare System SupportYouth Development & Educati…Youth Sports ProgramsProfessional & Industry Ass…Diverse Community Support S…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr17%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr15%92%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr17%3%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
18%
1,676/9,382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $14,015,753 · PhilanthropyIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $32,500 · PhilanthropySt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $261,050 · HealthIDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC — $174,000 · HealthSAINT ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER-NAMPA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $152,950 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $114,600 · HealthSAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC — $81,716 · HealthSt Charles Foundation Inc — $59,300 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $53,250 · HealthSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd — $36,500 · Health+2 more — $20,750 · HealthBoise State University Foundation Inc — $173,500 · EducationBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $15,000 · EducationWENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationBOISE RESCUE MISSION — $116,500 · OtherNational Multiple Sclerosis Society Greater Northwest Chapter — $17,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $15,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSION — $15,000 · OtherNAVAL HISTORICAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY - BOISE CORPS — $14,640 · OtherWOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 · OtherDISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO — $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · OtherIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $15,000 · OtherWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC — $15,000 · OtherPARASPORT SPOKANE — $11,000 · Other+2 more — $14,500 · OtherWomen's and Children's Alliance — $77,500 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $31,500 · Human ServicesGIRAFFE LAUGH INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE — $6,500 · Human ServicesIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $106,150 · EnvironmentCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentIdaho FFA Foundation Inc — $9,750 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$14,048,253Health$954,116Education$303,500Other$294,140Human Services$130,500Environment$106,150Youth Development$34,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $14,015,753 over 7y, 14% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $261,050 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetIDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC — $174,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $173,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER-NAMPA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $152,950 over 5y, 10% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $114,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $106,150 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC — $81,716 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance — $77,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSt Charles Foundation Inc — $59,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $53,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd — $36,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $31,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $25,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAL HISTORICAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetGIRAFFE LAUGH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPARASPORT SPOKANE — $11,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $10,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Regional Medical Center Ltd — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho FFA Foundation Inc — $9,750 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPendleton Foundation Trust — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFCH BUILDING HOPE PROJECT INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associatio Evergreen Chapter — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE — $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID36.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Four J Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Hansberger Foundation · Dallas and Alta Harris Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kissler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • American Welding Society Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph