· Private foundation
Hansberger Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO | $200,000 |
| YMCA | $200,000 |
| INTERFAITH SANCTUARY | $200,000 |
| IDAHO YOUTH RANCH | $162,000 |
| IDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $150,000 |
| JANNUS INC | $100,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME COUNSELING | $100,000 |
| WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE | $100,000 |
| AGENCY FOR NEW AMERICANS | $70,000 |
| IDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION | $50,000 |
| BOISE STATE PUBLIC RADIO | $50,000 |
| MCPAWS REGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER | $50,000 |
| THE CABIN | $50,000 |
| THE CABIN | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
- JIJANNUS INC3× · 2021–2024 · $458k · revenue +56%
- ISINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC4× · 2021–2024 · $385k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- CRCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -24%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
Inspire and nurture future explorers, innovators, and critical thinkers through interactive play in a safe, engaging environment with hands-on exhibits and programs designed specifically for children ages two to eight years old.
The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.
Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…
Our promise is to deliver an experience of financial success, with unique style, at every stage of your life.
Public Education.
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
The corporation advances charitable and educational initiatives as an affiliate of the Idaho Technology Council. It promotes digiatl literacy technology education and workforce readiness across Idaho by funding and delivering…
Public Education.
The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Humanities Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Young Mens Christian Association of Boise City Idaho. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds City of Good Inc ↗
- Who funds WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC ↗
- Who funds LEARNING LAB INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
- Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds IDAHO HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds BOISE CONTEMPORARY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Harad Family Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hansberger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.