· Private foundation
Dallas and Alta Harris Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of DALLAS AND ALTA HARRIS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $444k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $448k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARDING UNIVERSITY - SEE ADDENDUM FOR ADD'L INFORMATION | $1,410,753 |
| WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE | $86,500 |
| CAMP RAINBOW GOLD | $70,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY | $70,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $61,000 |
| IDAHO CITY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| COLLEGE OF IDAHO | $50,000 |
| CARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE | $50,000 |
| ST LUKES HEALTH FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $34,000 |
| FACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $310k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $371k · revenue +185%
- WAWomen's and Children's Alliance8× · 2017–2024 · $262k · revenue +26%
- CRCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC6× · 2019–2024 · $190k · revenue +190%
Funded once
- TVTreasure Valley Classical Academy Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +45%
- MOMEALS ON WHEEL METRO BOISEone grant, 2022 · $25k
- ICIDAHO CRISIS AND SUCIDE HOTLINEone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
"With open hearts and expertise, we serve the seriously ill and those touched by loss." Our grief and loss program is provided to patients' loved ones, but is also available to other members of our community. Palliative services are…
The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
Our mission is to protect, connect, and enhance wildlife habitat, working lands, and community spaces in southeast idaho, now and for future generations.
To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…
The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.
The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…
The Bonner General Health Foundation is committed to advancing the promise to change and save lives through philanthropy by developing resources and creating awareness that helps expand the trust the community has in Bonner General Health.
Our promise is to deliver an experience of financial success, with unique style, at every stage of your life.
To encourage and support a healthier community.
Public Education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is Glocal Community Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
- Who funds CARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
- Who funds Treasure Valley Classical Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds Idaho City Historical Foundation ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds JEMFRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOCAL COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLOSET INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Jeker Family Trust · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Langan Barber Foundation · The Bews Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dallas and Alta Harris Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.