Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kirchner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$387kEducation$46kYouth Development$38kPublic Benefit$16kArts & Culture$10kHealth$6kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$512k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$10,000
JOURNEY QUEST$10,000
WHIZ KIDS TUTORING$6,000
INDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTL$4,000
YOUTH DYNAMICS$4,000
CAPITOL HILL COMM SERVICES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$485k · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$485k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-24%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JQ
    Journey Quest Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $92k · revenue +27%
  • YD
    Youth Dynamics
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +51%
  • PR
    Pregnancy Resource Center Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • GH
    GOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -84%
  • DR
    DENVER RESCUE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Discovery Christian Church of Colorado

Make disciples of Jesus that make new disciples

Religion
2
Denver Area Youth for Christ Inc
Youth Development
3
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
4
Ascend Vail Inc

Evangelism and discipleship. Building Community. Pursuing Faith.

Religion
5
Denver Junior Golf

To educate and inspire youth academically, socially, and physically through the game of golf

Youth Development
6
D & J Solutions Dba Colorado Catholic Retreats

To provide weekend retreats for adult males and females in the rocky mountain region

Religion
7
San Juan Bible Conference San Juan Bible Camp

To provide youth with a non denominational summer camp in the san juan mountains of colorado

—
8
Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance

GDIA provides human service prevention treatment

Religion
9
Colorado Baptist General Convention

Mission Church to tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ to those who dont know.

—
10
U-Turn for Christ - Colorado

A residential drug and alcohol program.

Religion
11
Metro Ministries Inc

Addressing the physical and spiritual hunger of people in the Denver Metropolitan Area

—
12
Northwestern Co Youth for Christ

To reach young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer and the word of god, passion for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $269,000 · OtherVALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPYouth Dynamics: $24,000 · OtherYouth DynamicsINDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONALYOUNG LIFE ROYAL GORGE: $14,000 · OtherCAPITOL HILL COMM SERVICES: $14,000 · Other+4 more: $9,000 · OtherJourney Quest Inc: $92,000 · ReligionJourney Quest IncWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC: $42,000 · EducationWHIZ KIDS…Colorado Christian University: $1,500 · EducationGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePregnancy Resource Center Inc: $6,000 · HealthDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 · Human ServicesDenver Leadership Foundation: $1,500 · Public Benefit
Other$354,000Religion$92,000Education$43,500Arts & Culture$10,000Health$6,000Human Services$3,000Public Benefit$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJourney Quest Inc: $92,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC: $42,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetYouth Dynamics: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENVER STREET SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Leadership Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Christian University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Journey Quest Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Dynamics ↗
  • Who funds GOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE DENVER STREET SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Denver Leadership Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kirchner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kirchner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kirchner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph