Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kirchner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$387kEducation$46kYouth Development$38kPublic Benefit$16kArts & Culture$10kHealth$6kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$512k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$10,000
JOURNEY QUEST$10,000
WHIZ KIDS TUTORING$6,000
YOUTH DYNAMICS$4,000
INDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTL$4,000
CAPITOL HILL COMM SERVICES$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$485k · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$485k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-3%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JQ
    Journey Quest Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $92k · revenue +27%
  • YD
    Youth Dynamics
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +51%
  • PR
    Pregnancy Resource Center Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • GH
    GOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -84%
  • DR
    DENVER RESCUE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Discovery Christian Church of Colorado

Make disciples of Jesus that make new disciples

Religion
2
Denver Area Youth for Christ Inc
Youth Development
3
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
4
Ascend Vail Inc

Evangelism and discipleship. Building Community. Pursuing Faith.

Religion
5
Denver Junior Golf

To educate and inspire youth academically, socially, and physically through the game of golf

Youth Development
6
D & J Solutions Dba Colorado Catholic Retreats

To provide weekend retreats for adult males and females in the rocky mountain region

Religion
7
San Juan Bible Conference San Juan Bible Camp

To provide youth with a non denominational summer camp in the san juan mountains of colorado

8
Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance

GDIA provides human service prevention treatment

Religion
9
Colorado Baptist General Convention

Mission Church to tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ to those who dont know.

10
U-Turn for Christ - Colorado

A residential drug and alcohol program.

Religion
11
Metro Ministries Inc

Addressing the physical and spiritual hunger of people in the Denver Metropolitan Area

12
Northwestern Co Youth for Christ

To reach young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer and the word of god, passion for…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP — $269,000 · OtherVALLEY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPYouth Dynamics — $24,000 · OtherYouth DynamicsINDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL — $24,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONALYOUNG LIFE ROYAL GORGE — $14,000 · OtherCAPITOL HILL COMM SERVICES — $14,000 · Other+4 more — $9,000 · OtherJourney Quest Inc — $92,000 · ReligionJourney Quest IncWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC — $42,000 · EducationWHIZ KIDS…Colorado Christian University — $1,500 · EducationGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CulturePregnancy Resource Center Inc — $6,000 · HealthDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 · Human ServicesDenver Leadership Foundation — $1,500 · Public Benefit
Other$354,000Religion$92,000Education$43,500Arts & Culture$10,000Health$6,000Human Services$3,000Public Benefit$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJourney Quest Inc — $92,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC — $42,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetYouth Dynamics — $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENVER STREET SCHOOL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Leadership Foundation — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Christian University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Journey Quest Inc
  • Who funds WHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC
  • Who funds Youth Dynamics
  • Who funds GOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center Inc
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds THE DENVER STREET SCHOOL
  • Who funds Denver Leadership Foundation
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kirchner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph