Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$563kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$11kPhilanthropy$8kHealth$6kReligion$6kInternational$6kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCETON UNIV$65,000
UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHL$5,000
UNIV OF CHICAGO$5,000
SMART$3,750
Individual grant recipient$3,160
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHL$2,500
FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE$2,500
GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
MARIN COUNTRY DAYS SCHHL$2,500
MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
THERE WITH CARE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $250 → 6%THERE WITH CARE: $1k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $1k → 12%AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $2k → 13%Project Glimmer: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$367k · 14 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
71

Total granted

$367k
$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+3%

Still filing today

71%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2025 · $83k · revenue +21%
  • GP
    GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +17%
  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • US
    URBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2023 · $59k · revenue +3%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CC
    CKS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $36k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
10
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
11
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
12
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schools Mentoring and Resources Team Inc (Smart) and the most unlike its peers is Sprouts Chef Training. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%57%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
22/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University — $125,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $110,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $82,607 · EducationMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLURBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO — $58,970 · EducationURBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCOGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $55,975 · EducationGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS+9 more — $32,736 · Education+9 moreIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCKS COLLEGE — $36,035 · OtherCKS COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $29,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $14,250 · Other+70 more — $113,056 · Other+70 moreSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAUSALITO CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,500 · Arts & CultureCenter for Asian American Media — $500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $197 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE — $2,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT GLIMMER — $500 · Human ServicesCHALLENGE ASPEN — $250 · Human ServicesSLIDE RANCH — $2,249 · EnvironmentGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 · EnvironmentNETWORK FOR GOOD — $2,060 · Public Safety & DisasterLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC — $1,500 · Philanthropy
Education$465,288Other$312,641Arts & Culture$8,197Human Services$4,750Environment$3,249Public Safety & Disaster$2,060Philanthropy$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $82,607 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO — $58,970 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $55,975 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNUEVA SCHOOL — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $6,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSprouts Chef Training — $4,249 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAUSALITO CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSLIDE RANCH — $2,249 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $2,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHING CORPS — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,019 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $677 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Asian American Media — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT GLIMMER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Conscious Kid — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSQUASHDRIVE — $310 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC ROWING CLUB — $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE ASPEN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON FAMILIES — $182 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $179 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS SMILE INC — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeplers Literary Foundation — $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds URBAN SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds NUEVA SCHOOL
  • Who funds SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART)
  • Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY
  • Who funds Sprouts Chef Training
  • Who funds SAUSALITO CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds SLIDE RANCH
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA26.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · McNabb Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way Worldwide · American Endowment Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · The Yelp Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kilin & Cecilie to Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph