· Private foundation
The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 94 grants below total $8,595,313 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,963,174 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,367,861 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $909k
- $50k–250k36 grants · $3.0M
- $250k+11 grants · $4.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City of Phoenix Finance Department Payment Center | $762,000 |
| University Of Arizona Foundation | $690,000 |
| Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association | $500,000 |
| Rosies House A Music Academy For Children Inc | $500,000 |
| Umom New Day Centers Inc | $420,000 |
| Central Arizona Shelter Services Inc | $420,000 |
| Northern Arizona University Fdn Inc | $300,000 |
| Honorhealth Foundation | $272,000 |
| Arizona Agricultural Education/FFA Foundation | $250,000 |
| Honorhealth Foundation | $250,000 |
| Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Central and Northern Arizona | $250,000 |
| Diocesan Council For The Society Of St Vincent De Paul Diocese Phoenix | $200,000 |
| Maggies Place Inc. | $200,000 |
| Valleywise Health Foundation | $175,000 |
| Dignity Health Foundation - East Valley | $175,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Arizona Foundation3× · 2020–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +54%- BNBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +54%
- TATHE ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FFA FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2023 · $750k · revenue +79% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- GAGREATHEARTS ARIZONAgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $900k · revenue +38%
- TTTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -52%
- BHBanner Health Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATHEARTS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds THE ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FFA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION EAST VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA NATIONAL LIVESTOCK SHOW INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Food Bank ↗
- Who funds FLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UPWARD FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds GILBERT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · John F Long Foundation Inc · BHHS Legacy Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · American Express Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.