Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Karla Scherer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$768kArts & Culture$469kHealth$382kHuman Services$121kEnvironment$75kPublic Benefit$32kReligion$25kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$78,797
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$75,000
PROJECT FREEDIVE$51,110
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$28,890
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$20,000
FIELD MUSEUM$10,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION$10,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$10,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$5,000
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$5,000
PROVIDENCE ST MEL SCHOOL$5,000
COMMITTEE OF ARTS OF THE AMERICAS$5,000
ACLU$1,000
WFMT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG: $1k → 10%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG: $500 → 10%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG: $500 → 10%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 8%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $79k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CO
VA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 32 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
10

Total granted

$1.8M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+14%

Still filing today

59%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $294k · revenue +329%
  • University of Chicago
    4× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +56%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • OC
    OCEAN CONNECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • HM
    HELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
2
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
The Richard H Driehaus Museum

The driehaus museum engages and inspires the global community through exploration and ongoing conversations in art, architecture, and design of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. its permanent collection and temporary…

Arts & Culture
5
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
6
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
9
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
10
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
11
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
12
Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry

The Kenneth C. Griffin Museum of Science and Industry (the Museum), a 501(c)(3) corporation, is the largest science museum in the Western hemisphere and home to thousands of artifacts. For 90 years, the Museum has been a premier…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Shakespeare Theater; the most unlike its peers is Court Theatre Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SCHERER CENTER: $235,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SCHERER CENTERPROJECT FREEDIVE INC: $101,110 · OtherPROJECT FREEDIVE INCIndividual grant recipient: $97,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO HUMANITIES COUNCILOCEAN CONNECT INC: $75,000 · OtherOCEAN CONNECT INCProvidence St Mel School: $34,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $28,890 · Other+18 more: $82,488 · Other+18 moreTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $410,945 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARYUniversity of Chicago: $87,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $35,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $293,797 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOU…LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $16,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesChicago Humanities Festival: $73,500 · Arts & CultureChicago Humanitie…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $69,713 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF N…Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $65,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony …Lyric Opera of Chicago: $40,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of Ch…Court Theatre Fund: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCourt Theatre Fun…CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $17,500 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEA…+3 more: $20,770 · Arts & Culture+3 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $58,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $28,850 · Public BenefitRepresentUs Education Fund: $2,000 · Public BenefitHELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Social Science
Other$728,788Education$533,945Human Services$311,797Arts & Culture$311,483Health$58,500Public Benefit$30,850Social Science$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $410,945 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $293,797 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $87,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Humanities Festival: $73,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $69,713 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $28,850 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetTHIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLifeline Productions Inc: $4,270 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,903 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe River School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Humanities Festival ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds HELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lifeline Productions Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds PARAGON SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds The River School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lloyd a Fry FoundationIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lloyd a Fry Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Karla Scherer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Karla Scherer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Karla Scherer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Karla Scherer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karla Scherer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph