· Private foundation
The Kaplan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $177k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $555k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $235k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAFT MUSEUM OF ART | $75,000 |
| CINCINNATI BALLET | $60,000 |
| CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $50,000 |
| CET | $45,000 |
| SHOE4AFRICA | $40,000 |
| PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS | $35,000 |
| MERCY FOR ANIMALS | $30,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE | $30,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS | $22,000 |
| FREESTORE FOODBANK | $20,000 |
| OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER | $20,000 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| OHIO PET FUND | $20,000 |
| MID OHIO FOODBANK | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +64%
- PFPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +147%
INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $244k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- LALOIS AND RICHARD ROSENTHAL CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTone grant, 2023 · $200k
- CACINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $49k · revenue +113%
- IIISPACE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The society is dedicated to promoting care for all animals. we strive to never turn away sick or injured. our goal is to bring about a world where humane societies are no longer necessary.
Our mission is to serve the people and animals of Central Ohio by providing safe, temporary shelter and care for abandoned or otherwise homeless cats and dogs, and to reduce pet overpopulation by means of spay and neuter, education, and…
Our mission is ending the euthanasia of cats and dogs in local shelters and keeping pets in their loving homes by providing professional and affordable spay/neuter and wellness services.
To reduce the number of homeless cats and dogs in greater cincinnati by providing a compassionate, no-kill animal shelter and programs that promote responsible pet care.
The ohio society for the prevention of cruelty to animals works to prevent and stop cruelty to animals throughout ohio. our mission falls into three main areas: 1) intervention in cases of animal cruelty, 2) animal rehabilitation, and 3)…
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
Prevention/treatment of cruelty to animals
None
SAVE Ohio Pets is a non-profit whose mission is to reduce the homeless pet population in Central Ohio through community outreach and promoting spay/neuter, adoption, volunteering, and education. We operate a free, monthly vet care and…
Enrich the lives of cats and communities in Greater Cincinnati by providing low-cost, high-quality spay/neuter services for ferals, strays and pets; offering trap-neuter-return and other outreach programs; and operating a no-kill adoption…
Rescue and adoption of animals
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbus Humane and the most unlike its peers is Haven House Emergency Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS DOG CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Columbus ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITIES HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds SHOE4AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Greater Cincinnati ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · L Brands Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Hcs Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Cardinal Health Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kaplan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Kaplan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Kaplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.