Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kao Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$126kEducation$9kHealth$6kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$3kInternational$2kCommunity Improvement$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$444k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$7,000
FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$5,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$5,000
USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
CURE SANFILIPPO FOUNDATION$2,000
CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION$1,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP- USA$1,000
THE PEACH FOUNDATION$1,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$1,000
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC$1,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH ASSOCIATION$1,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$1,000
CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER$1,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION INC$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEACH FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $3k → 10%CMAAA OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%METRO WORLD CHILD FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 20%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $4k → 16%CURE SANFILIPPO FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $2k → 9%USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 16%INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $1k → 9%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 16%INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $1k → 9%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 16%INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $1k → 9%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $2k → 16%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $1k → 9%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $2k → 16%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $1k → 9%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $2k → 16%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $1k → 16%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $1k → 16%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 14%FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2k → 14%PAMC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $5k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $5k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $5k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $4k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%GLOBAL FEDERATION OF CHINESE BUSINESS WOMEN SOUTHE: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
PA
CA
CO
NC
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Kao Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Kao Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 10 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$133k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+26%

Still filing today

30%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthInternationalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +62%
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CW
    CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • RF
    RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -28%
  • CO
    CMAAA OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
2
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
3
International Fellowship of Christian Short-Term Missions Incorporated

To engage in local and overseas evangelism, mission training & supports, empowering churches worldwide to live out the short-term mission movement, where chiristians can participate in sharing the gospel and fulfilling the great commission.

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Chinese Christian Scholars Association in North America

To share Gospel with Chinese intellectuals. The goals of the Association are 1. to network and discipline Chinese Christian scholars in North America for their moral and academic excellence, 2. to reach the unreached Chinese academic world…

Religion
7
Gets Theological Seminary

Provide theological education

Education
8
Chinese Gospel Broadcasting Center Inc

Religious broadcasting services to involve christians in professional and media fields to join force in the production of gospel programs for radio and

Arts & Culture
9
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion
10
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
11
Centrihall Chinese Christian Education Services Inc

Develop and publish multi-media Christian courses for e-learning

Religion
12
Cardinal Kung Foundation Inc

To promote the Roman Catholic Church in China now under persecution through increased prayers financial support and other appropriate projects.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cure Sanfilippo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $48,000 · OtherFIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEYFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $39,610 · OtherFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCHINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $5,000 · Other+10 more: $17,000 · Other+10 moreBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $29,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIPInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $2,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian …+2 more: $2,000 · Religion+2 moreRENEWAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE PEACH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $2,000 · HealthUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $1,813 · Housing & ShelterMetro World Child Foundation Inc: $1,000 · International
Other$109,610Religion$33,000Education$4,000Health$4,000Arts & Culture$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,813International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENEWAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetro World Child Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SERVICE FELLOWSHIP: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds PAMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cure Sanfilippo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GETS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Metro World Child Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FELLOWSHIP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

MY Charitable FoundationDE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: MY Charitable Foundation · California Community Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kao Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kao Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kao Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph