Skip to content

· Private foundation

The June & Cecil McDole Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$523kHealth$423kEducation$296kPublic Safety & Disaster$277kHuman Services$204kReligion$129kCommunity Improvement$120kArts & Culture$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $167k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MICHIGAN$30,000
RAY TOWNSHIP FIRE & RESCUE AUX$30,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$26,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$26,000
CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$17,500
HORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND AT CRANBROOK$15,000
OAKLAND HOPE$12,500
HOSTEL DETROIT$10,000
WRCJ$7,500
MICHIGAN RED SOX$7,500
LIGHTHOUSE EMERGENCY SERVICES$7,500
CROSS OF CHRIST CHURCH$7,000
KIDS COALITION AGAINST HUNGER$7,000
A HOLE IN THE ROOF FOUNDATION$5,000
LIFE REMODELED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $4k → 10%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $5k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $5k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $5k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $5k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $5k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $8k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $8k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 45 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
11

Total granted

$2.2M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+38%

Still filing today

36%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OAKLAND HOPE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +36%
  • MR
    MICHIGAN RED SOX
    4× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +156%
  • HD
    HOSTEL DETROIT
    6× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • UF
    US FOR BELIZE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +380%
  • SOUTHWEST SOLUTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
About Face Detroit
—
2
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
4
Detroit Donates Inc
Housing & Shelter
5
Have Faith Haiti Mission Support Trust

To operate as a supporting organization by supporting and carrying out the charitable, religious, literary, and educational functions of s.a.y. detroit. to aid and assist impoverished children by meeting their safety, medical, housing,…

Housing & Shelter
6
Higher Hopes

Our mission is to benefit the community of detroit through the combinedefforts of businesses, foundations and individuals to provide fullthanksgiving meals to low-income households who are not financially able toprovide a thanksgiving…

Human Services
7
Faith Works Michigan

Provide volunteers to assist people in need (such as widows) and organizations in need (such as churches) with repairs and maintenance of homes and buildings.

Human Services
8
Detroit Friendship House Inc

Friendship house meets the basic needs of low income residents of hamtramck, mi. this assistance includes food, clothing, baby supplies and school supplies.

Human Services
9
Rick Webb Ministries

To work with churches around michigan to honor god through collaborative services with food, games, live worship, biblical teaching, prayer, response time, and small groups.

—
10
Corewell Health Foundation West Michigan

Improve health, instill humanity and inspire hope.

Health
11
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
12
Family Network

Family network desires to serve the greater wyoming, mi area by providing food, resources and services to people in need.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forgotten Harvest Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Why Wouldn't We Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAY TOWNSHIP FIRE & RESCUE AUX: $209,500 · OtherRAY TOWNSHIP FIRE & RESCUE AUXHORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND AT CRANBROOK: $128,750 · OtherHORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND AT CRANBROOKREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $105,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $99,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGANKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $80,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $69,500 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE EMERGENCY SERVICES: $67,000 · OtherTHE BEAUMONT FOUNDATION: $62,500 · OtherCROSS OF CHRIST CHURCH: $57,500 · OtherUNIV OF MICH STEPHEN M ROSS SCHOOL: $57,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $51,500 · Other+35 more: $523,000 · Other+35 moreGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $238,500 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOO…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $133,500 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INCOAKLAND HOPE: $85,000 · Food & NutritionOAKLAND HOPELIFE REMODELED: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterA HOLE IN THE ROOF FOUNDATION: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterPaws With A Cause: $41,250 · Human ServicesBUILDUP STEAM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN RED SOX: $66,000 · Recreation & SportsHOSTEL DETROIT: $65,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE WHY WOULDN'T WE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,511,250Food & Nutrition$457,000Housing & Shelter$82,500Human Services$66,250Recreation & Sports$66,000Community Improvement$65,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $238,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $133,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND HOPE: $85,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetMICHIGAN RED SOX: $66,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetHOSTEL DETROIT: $65,000 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetKids Coalition Against Hunger: $49,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetLIFE REMODELED: $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $41,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOAKLAND COUNTY PIONEER AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetA HOLE IN THE ROOF FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBUILDUP STEAM INC: $25,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WHY WOULDN'T WE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetUS FOR BELIZE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMartin Memorial Foundation Inc: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND MEALS ON WHEELS: $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHERITAGE WORKS: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST SOLUTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID'S FAITH & HOPE FOR LIFE FOUND: $8,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget42STRONG: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE CARE SENIOR MEALS PROGRAM: $4,250 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN RED SOX ↗
  • Who funds HOSTEL DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Kids Coalition Against Hunger ↗
  • Who funds LIFE REMODELED ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND COUNTY PIONEER AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds A HOLE IN THE ROOF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUILDUP STEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS ↗
  • Who funds THE WHY WOULDN'T WE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds US FOR BELIZE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Martin Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND MEALS ON WHEELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The June & Cecil McDole Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The June & Cecil McDole Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 62%
  • Us for Belize Foundation for Research & Environmental Education Inc: 62% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The June & Cecil McDole Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The June & Cecil McDole Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on June & Cecil McDole’s filings →

More from the funding graph