Skip to content

Maine · Private foundation

The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
23
Organizations funded FY2023
96%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$500,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 23
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$24M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 96% of the organizations The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $494k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$777k75%
FY202323$994k96%
FY20225$683k100%
FY20212$825kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$2.3MEducation$2.1MCivil Rights$155kArts & Culture$91kHuman Services$65kPhilanthropy$25kEnvironment$20kInternational$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Maine Behavioral Healthcare$1,000,0002n/a
University of New England$500,00010%
MaineHealth$325,00010%
Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine$120,000127%
Nami Maine$75,00013%
University of Southern Maine Foundation$75,00021%
The Yellow Tulip Project$55,000112%
Tree of Life Foundation$50,000113%
The Jed Foundation$50,00010%
Source School$43,1411n/a
Show all 28 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($799k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 25 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of New England: $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMaineHealth: $325,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHolocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine: $120,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNami Maine: $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetUniversity of Southern Maine Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Yellow Tulip Project: $55,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTree of Life Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Jed Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProsperityme: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Recovery Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSenator George J Mitchell Scholarship Research Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMaine Immigrants' Rights Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Ocean Observatory: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetSeeds of Peace Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMaine Conservation Alliance: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHolocaust Museum La: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpeedwell Projects: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUnion of Maine Visual Artists Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetOlympia Snowe Women's Leadership Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cromwell Center for Disabilities Awareness: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPortland Ovations: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Inside Out: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 25.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME43.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Albert B Glickman Family Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Onion Foundation · Maine Initiativesinc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · United Way Inc · Horizon Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation

How much does The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation give?
The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $1,277,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 23 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (47%), Education (45%), Civil Rights (3%).
Who are The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Maine Behavioral Healthcare ($1.0M), University of New England ($500k), MaineHealth ($325k).
Does The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 96% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Maine Community Foundation Inc, Sam L Cohen Foundation, Albert B Glickman Family Foundation.
Where is The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation based?
The Judy Glickman Lauder Foundation is based in ME.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Judy Glickman Lauder’s filings →

More from the funding graph