Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joyce C Stern Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.5MCivil Rights$225kInternational$208kHealth$175kAnimals$142kHousing & Shelter$135kRecreation & Sports$131kScience & Tech$120kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HESCHEL SCHOOL$150,000
MACCABI USA$36,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$35,000
ASPCA$25,000
ALL 4 THE DOGS RESCUE$20,000
GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION$12,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST$10,000
THE BUONICONTI FUND$10,000
CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL$5,000
SHEFA SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of The Joyce C Stern Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Joyce C Stern Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 18 repeat orgs$431k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$2.0M
$416k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+2%

Still filing today

61%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $225k · revenue +102%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    8× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +145%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MC
    Met Council Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $135k
  • CR
    CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +86%
  • UI
    UJA ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shefa School and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,734

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HESCHEL SCHOOL — $964,000 · OtherHESCHEL SCHOOLTHE BUONICONTI FUND — $155,000 · OtherTHE BUONICONTI FUNDMet Council Inc — $135,000 · OtherMet Council IncUJA ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND — $75,000 · OtherCHRIS & DANA REEVE FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Other+23 more — $319,510 · Other+23 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $515,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLU…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $225,000 · Civil RightsCentral Fund of Israel — $185,000 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INC — $15,000 · International+2 more — $7,500 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $95,000 · AnimalsTHE ASHER HOUSE — $10,000 · Animals+1 more — $2,500 · AnimalsCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthMANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOCCER STARS FOUNDATION — $31,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,713,510Education$520,000Civil Rights$225,000International$207,500Animals$107,500Health$85,000Youth Development$76,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $515,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $225,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $185,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMACCABI USA INC — $49,140 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOCCER STARS FOUNDATION — $31,500 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetCULTURE FOR ONE — $20,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISRAEL FOREVER FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWags and Walks — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds Met Council Inc
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds MANHATTAN SOCCER CLUB INC
  • Who funds SOCCER STARS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CULTURE FOR ONE
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ASHER HOUSE
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC
  • Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL FOREVER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joyce C Stern Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph